@MoJGovUK “You’ve won”, said barrister. NOT GUILTY says judge; therefore Jury doesn’t hear Defendants’ cases. Happy Ending under the Shard!

16 07 18 Happy Ending

“No prison!” is another way of formulating victory!
On this warm summer evening 16 07 19 Ham and High
under a spotless sky, we celebrated in the beautiful garden of the Lion & Unicorn, the charming pub in Kentish Town with a delightful 16 07 14 Ham and High 2theatre.

I got to know it thanks to Far from Fiction – a play that asks whether women harm themselves or whether society harms them such that they harm themselves, because women can’t be loving mothers in a patriarchal world…

How can their children become loving partners and loving parents when nobody teaches life, living and loving?

The notion of theatre as therapy continues to intrigue me:

  • who are we as actor, director and playwright of our life?16 07 18 David and Sabine v
  • how do we create our stage?
  • who creates our illusions?
  • who are the masters of deception?
  • how can we learn to distinguish between realities and fantasies?

We have to find out for ourselves.

Just like Faust who made a deal with Mephistopheles

One day / event / experience / relationship at a time – before, during and after this life time….

This is the music that accompanied me through our trial:


@BBCRadio4 #betrayal #mis-representation #PublicInterest: The #Satanic cult that wasn’t, 8pm

Channel IV reported about Satanic Ritual Abuse already in 1990, calling their program LISTEN TO THE CHILDREN. But the BBC knows better: they promote the ‘next generation Savile’ in the Victoria Derbyshire show and deny the allegations of the ‘whistleblower kids’ in their program The Satanic Cult that Wasn’t. Here I asked the Producer to withdraw my implied consent:

15 04 23 BBC Radio 4Dear Joe [Kent]

I let you know in no uncertain terms that I was far from happy with Melanie’s interview last week. [I had in fact refused to make the connection with the mother. IF ONLY I had seen the announcement for tonight at 8pm! But Joe led me to believe that it would be a half hour programme called ‘The Report’. Only later did I discover that two other activists had been interviewed. He phoned one of them asking her to change her mind about withdrawing her consent. But he did NOT phone me!]

This is therefore to let you know that I am withdrawing my implicit consent to the interview I gave on Monday 13th April 2015.

No matter how you’ll cut, I do not want any of my words to be part of “The Report” for I KNOW that my words will be used for mis-representation, since all questions were biased in the first place.

Melanie even went as far as saying “there is no evidence”. That is neither reporting nor investigating. Continue reading

#WhistleblowerKids cover-up by #Satanists in #ChristChurchHampstead: blood stains

I feel greatly encouraged by The Coleman Experience‘s latest publication:

Hence I put together Victims in Exile about Ella and I fleeing the UK two months ago.

Here I put together Coleman’s posts about

  • Filthy Britain
  • Satanic Secrets
  • Wall of Shame
  • Malevolent Masons
  • Pervs in Parliament
  • Links to Mossad –
  • besides Suffer the Little Children of Britain…

Coleman dares to speak strong language. And he is confident that the clock is ticking for the walls of Jericho to tumble down…


Screenshot_2015-03-29-21-10-46Meanwhile, do consider these blood stains on the floor of Christ Church Hampstead.

And do note the various levels of cover-ups:

The latest is the cover-up by Christ Church who invoke their own Ecclesiastical law to get Neelu and Christine arrested because they had been demonstrating outside the church. They spent a weekend in a cell before being seen in court.

It’s hard to tell the full story as it is going on and after an excellent overview was taken down, based on information from a known paedophile… The hosting company knows whom to trust and believe…

DEAR #MP #ChildSexualAbuse #CSA is an #Election Issue!

Please note this voting record of MPs regarding the Official Secrets Act.

This email went to all MPs without referring to it.

Dear MP,

This is to ask whether you are willing to stand up for children and against their organised and orchestrated abuse, as covered-up historically and currently by supporting victims of institutionalised child snatching, forced adoptions and sexual exploitation.

The current case is about the 8-year-old boy and 9-year-old girl who have become ‘internet famous’ as the whistleblower kids. For they told their mother, partner and the Police – in a completely consistent manner over a few weeks – about the rape and torture they had experienced and witnessed, together with some 20 other children, besides crimes pertaining to a secret cult with about 70 members – in eight schools in the Hampstead Highgate area of London.

On behalf of the children and their Russian mother and grandparents, the challenge is to appeal the judgement of Mrs Justice Pauffley that she announced to the press as ‘Satanic cult claims dismissed’. Her critics talk about professional misconduct, abuse of judicial position and that she misrepresented facts presented in the case, was negligent in her role and derelict in her duties. Continue reading

#MoJ We demand an Immediate Emergency Protection Order for the #WhistleblowerKids

Dear Ministry of Justice,
I remind the Ministry of Justice of the Infringement Notice issued against the UK in relation to violations against EU Directives: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-is-new/eu-law-and-monitoring/infringements_by_country_united_kingdom_en.htm.
The actions of the MoJ in this case as presented below, will reflect on further legal evidence toward that Infringement, should British Authorities continue to act in ignorance of EU Law and with calls for economic sanctions against Britain via the EU Council who may be aware of this case and its multiple infringements of EU Law – due to this EU Petition: https://mckenzies4fairness.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/15-03-02-petition-1707.pdf
Please be on LEGAL NOTICE that on receipt of this information you are now a witness and a legally recognised Authority to whom a report of serious risk to British children has been alleged and is supported by multiple witnesses, circumstantial evidence and multiple professional medical facts.
In ignoring and/or failing to act on this information, you are personally and as an authority, complicit and criminally negligent according to EU & UK Law.
As you know, UK Law operates on previous Court Judgements which are then set as a precedent for future Judgements unless, evidence arrives to alter those judgements according to certain facts.
Read below – presented as a ‘famous’ example in Human Rights to a Fair Trial. The issue here is ‘restrictive order’ and ‘fair trial’ – which in this case, relates to a mother and her children who are respectively, suffering threat of arrest and taken into state custody.
Case study
The control order regime enacted by the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (and still in force at the time of publication) imposes severe restrictions, including house arrest, on anyone suspected of being involved in terrorism-related activity.  Under the policy, the Secretary of State makes a decision as to whether a control order should be made and the courts then consider the decision made.  In many cases, control orders have been made on the basis of closed material – where the person subject to the control order has never been given the chance to see the case against them.
 The House of Lords held in June 2009 that this breached the right to a fair trial under Article 6.  The Law Lords held that a person subject to such a restrictive order had to be given sufficient information to know the essence of the case against him or her. It was held that there could never be a fair trial if the case against a person was based solely or to a decisive degree on closed materials and where any open material consists only of general assertions.  The Court held that in conducting control order hearings judges must consider whether material needs to be disclosed to ensure the fairness of the trial.’
It was held that there could never be a fair trial if the case against a person was based solely or to a decisive degree on closed materials and where any open material consists only of general assertions.
Justice Pauffley’s judgement recent High Court Judgement against said Mother in relation to her children’s allegations of serious sexual abuse against themselves and 20 other “special” children via multiple professionals including teachers, Cafcass officers, social workers and professional-status parents who also are accused of making child pornography, child trafficking and murder of babies, was delivered in ignorance of both UK & EU Law and especially, considering the evidence supporting the mother and children was the ONLY evidence that did NOT depend on ‘closed materials‘ and ‘general assertions‘.
Example of Children’s testimonies via non-abusers: Gabriel: http://zeeklytv.com/video/19744/Gabriel-05-Sep-I-27-min
Example of Children’s testimonies via alleged abusers: Alisa: http://zeeklytv.com/video/19745/Alisa-17-Sep-II-5-min
All video recordings of both allegations and retractions can be viewed here: http://zeeklytv.com/video/19748/Alisa-11-Sep-II-24-min
Circumstantial evidence provided by independent investigations due to lack of police investigation – see all video presentations of publicly investigated, circumstantial evidence here: http://zeeklytv.com/video/24833/CCPS-Vid-10-A-Hampstead-Baby-Trafficker
Foster Carer: “Although we know that they have retracted their statements, the children still, even now keep coming back to the same story and the details, while in the foster care to the degree that it became unbearable for their caretaker C to look after them. She no longer wants to do this.” http://trendwave.com/Parenting/COVER-UP-OF-SATANIC-CHILD-ABUSE-IN-HAMPSTEAD—Aangirfan
Please compare ALL of the above evidence to the ‘closed’ and ‘general’ evidence on which Justice Pauffley delivered her judgement.
We have been informed by the Home Office, that this case is presently being investigated by special police unit ‘Operation Hydrant’ (see Home Office attachment sent to the MoJ prior to this email).
In light of this, the recent High Court case legally, SHOULD have been adjourned until further investigations were completed as evidence MAY prove the children’s story true and thereby, deny allegations against the Mother.
In this case, a judgement has been issued amid ONGOING Police Investigations.
It is clear, examining the video testimonies that the children’s retractions ARE coached and are very flimsy when compared to the original allegations which, we CANNOT forget were REPEATED to foster carers.
It was when the children retracted the retractions that legally, mother and her counsel had NO CHOICE except to report their reasonable and supported suspicions in GOOD FAITH to ‘other’ competent authorities which is their LEGAL RIGHT under EU Law: See Sections 26, 28 & 50 – all fully support and request the actions taken by Mother and her Counsel in making this case public in light of negligent and suspect authorities – the LEGAL POINT OF ISSUE HERE IS TO BE SURE THAT MULTIPLE CHILDREN WERE AND ARE NOT BEING ABUSED & MURDERED BY MULTIPLE PROFESSIONALS INVOLVED IN ALL ASPECTS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITY IN CHILD WELFARE.
It is the LACK of assuredness coupled with the REMAINING suspicion supported by the EVIDENCE, that legally demands IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION: The risk to child safety is both urgent and ongoing. A 12 day ‘fact-finding’ mission via the High Court after MONTHS of negligent inaction, is nowhere near ample enough time, to thoroughly investigate the facts presented in this case which present far too serious a threat to British children to be so casually handled and as casually dismissed by via Court proceedings which themselves, show an equally casual approach to EU & UK Law.
Considering the power of the collective authorities as police, cafcass officers, social workers etc. etc., and as actual suspects, and, considering the serious risk according to EU Legal Directives toward investigating this case AND protecting children SUSPECTED of being at risk according to the lawfully required GOOD FAITH we have in the EVIDENCE, as Ministry of Justice faced with allegedly ROGUE Authorities involving Courts, Police and Child Welfare, it is now your LAWFUL DUTY to IMMEDIATELY ACT and to remove the children from RISK OF HARM until further investigations are completed.
In light of negligent and allegedly abusive authorities, there is no other body of authority for the British public to turn to because according to the evidence, MANY MORE CHILDREN REMAIN AT RISK – the collective powers of alleged abusers amount to a SECRET and Court  protected, terrorist threat to the children of Britain.
Considering the ever mounting evidence relating historical crimes of child sexual abuse and even, more recent, via multiple professionals working as MPs, Heads of Police, Councillors, Government Ministers etc., the grounds and cause for our remaining suspicions in this case, are further increased.
According to the evidence presented here, it is well within compassionate reason to realise the very serious risk which arises from the very real POSSIBILITY that two children and 20 other children were and perhaps still are, being repeatedly sexually abused by multiple professionals, that in their professional capacity, those abusers have used the Secrecy of the Family Courts, to abduct the victims/witnesses, intimidate them into retracting their allegations and issue arrest warrants against mother & her counsel in order to imprison them and thereby silence their concerns.
Please, use whatever powers you can
  • to issue an Emergency Care Order to protect the children from further RISK.
  • Please deliver the children to the SAFETY AND COMFORT of their family London home where their grandparent’s await.
  • Please CONSIDER the IMMENSE trauma that BRITISH AUTHORITY NEGLIGENCE in handling this case has put those children through, in the sense, they have MERCILESSLY handed those children over to alleged abusers in IGNORANCE of EU Law.
According to EU Law, the ONLY child testimonies to have legal credibility are those given when in hands of non-abusers. Though Mother and partner are now accused as ‘abusers’, it is very CLEARLY explained here exactly WHY that Judgement is VOID and actually, has NO legal foundation.
Foster Carers are NOT cited as abusers which means the allegations given to parties of mother, police and foster carers and other witnesses are considered FREELY GIVEN, while retractions are all in secret and while in care of alleged abusers are not legally accepted as ‘freely given’ – according to EU Law the original allegations  (especially after they were repeated with accusations that retractions were via intimidation while in control of alleged abusers) are the ONLY allegations that can be granted PRECEDENCE toward warranting a FULL and IMMEDIATE investigation into this case.
ALL of the evidence presented here is INFORMING the Ministry of Justice of SERIOUS ongoing RISK to British children. It is your public DUTY to ACT and to use your powers to protect children in light of there being NO OTHER AUTHORITY PREPARED TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AND PROTECT CHILDREN FROM RISK AND HARM OF ABUSIVE AUTHORITIES.
This is a public demand delivered via a public judgement on this case in light of and according to both EU and UK LAW. It is our legal right as a legally recognised competent authority in this case and having examined all related evidence, to issue this judgement as an interim solution prior to the pending results of present and ongoing Police Investigations via Operation Hydrant.
We the public therefore request that the Ministry of Justice supports our sound and lawful judgement which hereby, issues an ‘Emergency Protection Order’ for the IMMEDIATE* transference of said children from care of present authorities and into care of their grandparents.
*You are on Notice to act IMMEDIATELY on receipt of this information and to make every effort toward ensuring the return of the children to their grandparents. We are aware that the day of this Notice is issued on a Friday and we order that nonetheless, the urgent need in light of the continued and reasoned RISK, cannot lawfully be ignored over the weekend ; the Public Order is that the children are swiftly removed from control of allegedly abusive/suspect authorities.
Failure to honour our Democratic Judgement and public request for our Legal Order, will lead to further charges of Infringement of EU Directives against British Authorities and of which, the Ministry of Justice itself will now be directly implicated.
Yours Sincerely,
Miss AB, as a British Citizen, as an accepted, public representative and spokesperson on behalf of mother, her counsel and the children of Britain, and as an experienced and enlightened independent, authority on the issues of both law and assessment of risk related to this case.

Continue reading

SAY IT in Poetry beyond Prose and Music beyond Words #WhistleblowerKids

Olivia Douglas is the artist who sent me not only a German press release about this case, but also this poem:

part of humanity

leaving us
for answers
to find signs
of deviousness
to prove
it’s not part
of humanity
it merely is

redefined daily
by our deeds

© olivia douglas, 2015

What it means to be human?

  • trying to heal where there is hurt
  • trying to help where there is need
  • connecting rather than splitting
  • communicating honestly and openly
  • spreading positivity to overcome negativity…

Here’s another fabulous example: comments about the case and judgement – accompanied with music by ‘Matters of the Harp’: http://zeeklytv.com/video/26139/Hampstead-Child-Abuse-Reaction

We are living in interesting times where we need to decide which side we are on: good or evil – not only individually, but collectively! 99% vs 1%…

Have you already seen my latest petition with its overview of the case on https://www.change.org/p/police-judiciary-mainstream-media-and-internet-corporations-free-whistleblowerkids-and-investigate-hampstead-cover-ups-to-professional-standards ?

And the ideal platform for collaboration: http://www.meetup.com/whistleblowerkids/ ?