Three petitions are dead. Long live a Witness Statement and #EU Debates #WhistleblowerKids

15 07 17 have done it again – listen to paedos, shills, trolls, hoaxers rather than appreciate the battles we’re fighting: they removed the third petition, with 1,184 signatures last time I looked. The story of the first and most successful one is here.

So the only petition that is left for you to sign and share is

The title used to be Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent. But now we have this fabulous chance of supporting

  1. a debate in the EU Parliament of 751 Parliamentarians on 07 September 2015 and
  2. a debate among the Heads of the 28 Member States in the EU Council on 15/16 October 2015. 

PLEASE do sign! It’s worth it! has the great advantage of triggering emails to the ‘target’ of the petition. So the leaders of the political groups who most democratically schedule the debates will see that this is what we want: every single signature triggers an email to them! We the people in the UK need this above all else (even if I’m in Berlin)!

I’m just working on the differences between UK and EU countries and got a lot of input from former MP John Hemming who writes clearly that the pressure by the government to increase adoptions results in practices that would be unlawful on the Continent, but are normal in English law… 

Russian Parliamentarian Olga Borzova calls what is policy in the UK ‘abusive’ in her report Social services in Europe: legislation and practice of the removal of children from their families in Council of Europe member States!

Meanwhile I put this Witness Statement together for the appeal hearing next Tuesday 04 August. I have been refused Legal Aid. I have nothing to lose and nothing to hide. If not now, when? If not me, who?

Witness Statement

Advocacy on behalf of 20 Hampstead Children and the Whistleblower Kids[1] as Child Witnesses

In the Name of the “Evil and / or Foolish” Internet Community
who “Sought to Perpetuate” the Children’s Claims

[Quotes from Mrs Justice Pauffley’s Judgement[2] of 19.03.15]


  1. This Witness Statement is written in the spirit of the legal principle “Publicity is the Very Soul of Justice[3]. It is the surest of all guards against improbity.It keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial.
  2. It is also written in the spirit of the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby’s judgement Re J (A Child)[4] in which he invites courts to “adapt to the realities of the internet and in particular social media”.

Continue reading


The Hampstead Horrors Happened Elsewhere

Crimes of Empire

Hampstead Cover Up Similar Story From 1989 Satans Children

Satanic Ritual Abuse has Deep Roots. Hampstead children not lying! UK COVER UPS

July 29th, 2015.

A Very Simple Choice.

It is deeply unwelcome information. It is knowledge that cannot possibly bring happiness or pleasure but to pretend that these things do not happen is to be complicit in the acts of evil. There is no choice. Not really.

I have never really been associated with Satanism, but assume that most Satanists or dark occultists do not engage in these practices. It is clear however that some, indeed apparently many do.

The fact that there was a fairly successful short term cover up of the Hampstead case should come as no surprise, nor should the complicity of the BBC in the cover up with their laughable, disgusting interview of the Hampstead “Dad”. The BBC is an organisation with long and intimate…

View original post 43 more words

RICKY DEARMAN – Father of #WhistleblowerKids – Professional Housesitter in #SatanicHollywood?

15 07 27 Dearman

His then 8- and 9-year-old son and daughter accuse him of being the leader of a cult and killing babies

  1. The children talking about their experiences:
    • These videos were taken at the end of holidays during which they ‘talked’ for the first time, even though their father had threatened to kill them.
    • Then the Police interviewed them on 05 and 11 September 2014 when they took them into ‘emergency protection’. On 17 September they were forced to make retractions.
  2. The father’s criminal past is listed on
    • He had two ‘non-molestation orders’ against him, while the mother held a ‘Residence Order’ and the children had lived with her all their lives.
    • He had also tried to break the mother’s skull, but she was too intimidated to press charges.
  3. We got involved as ‘McKenzie Friends’ (lay legal advisors) of the well educated Russian mother in November 2014 and saw the father in court. He was ‘automatically’ part of the ‘public law proceedings’ of the local authority, Barnet Council vs the mother, father and the children. He was given weekly contact and the mother only fortnightly.
    • A judgement dismissing the children’s allegations was made on 19 March 2015.
  4. Subsequently Ricky Dearman gave an interview to the BBC to support the judge’s opinion.

Continue reading