Hampstead Research Video 22: Dearman VD Interview Analysis

These fabulous videos and the amazing blog get around: over 1,000 blog views per day and 700,000 views on one video!

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “Hampstead Research Video 22: Dearman VD Interview Analysis

  1. Just sent this again(5th time) to that lovable figure making big decisions – in our interest – on who, and who not to, prosecute:

    To the Public Servant, Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions

    I sent you the following email on 20th, 27th, 30th April and 4th May, 2015.
    This is now the fifth time you – or people in your office – have received this, yet I am still awaiting a reply.
    Would you, out common human decency, kindly respond.

    TO THE PUBLIC SERVANT, ALISON SAUNDERS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

    As one of the public, I inform you of that public’s interest in prosecuting, for perpetrating crimes of fraud, Judge Mrs Anna Pauffley and the Metropolitan Police officers Detective Inspector John Cannon and Detective Constable Rogers of Barnet Police Station. The three public servants committed fraud during the child rape and murder investigation in Hampstead, and the subsequent hearing and public Judgement in the Royal Courts of Justice over the period 5th September, 2014 to 19th March, 2015.
    THE INVESTIGATION
    Film clips showing the children naming their attackers individually, and giving detailed descriptions of distinguishing marks on and around each of their named attackers’ private parts were concealed from police throughout the entire investigation by DC Rogers of Barnet Police Station Child Abuse Unit, who sent them to a property store in Chingford.
    This concealment of evidence by DC Rogers was/is FRAUD.
    Detective Inspector Cannon, who led the team investigating the child rape and murder case, never required the adults named by the children as their attackers to undergo medical inspection in order to be eliminated from the inquiry, despite the children’s detailed knowledge of distinguishing marks on and around their attackers’ private parts. It appears the police never even questioned these adults! This shows the intention of DI Cannon, i.e. to AVOID requiring those people NAMED and intimately identified by the children to undergo a medical examination to clear themselves. The only possible objectors to such a medical examination are those people named by the children as their attackers who also have distinguishing marks on or around their privates MATCHING the descriptions given by the children.
    DI Cannon’s effective blocking of the necessary medical examinations and interviews of these suspects, and then claiming the investigation was “wide ranging” (see para 38. Judge Pauffley’s Judgement) is clearly FRAUD.
    The children were interviewed by police on 5th September and again on 11th September 2014, and in both interviews their accounts were very consistent. Obviously not satisfied, The Authorities ordered the children to be detained, and six days later a third set of interviews were produced. Despite the many leading questions from their interrogator, the children reaffirmed many parts of their stories. The interviewer clearly uses suggestion and leads the children throughout these interviews, which is not only gross professional misconduct, but is also psychological abuse of the children. He should also be prosecuted.
    The police investigation was closed before the police had received the medical report from University College Hospital’s Consultant Paediatrician Dr Deborah Hodes. The report CONFIRMED anal injury, which was consistent with both children’s allegations of sexual abuse. The case could not LAWFULLY be closed without first receiving the results from the medical examinations – which the police themselves had requested! The closing of the investigation was, and is, UNLAWFUL.
    THE HEARING
    The hearing was conducted in secret, and was completely one-sided. Ella draper and her legal representative, Sabine McNeill, had been hounded out of the country following threats and actual attempts to imprison them by criminals posing as police officers.
    The entire hearing was, in short, a convening of parties hostile to ella draper and her children. So, what was there to HEAR actually? It was just a show-hearing from start to finish, totally devoid of anything lawful.
    THE JUDGEMENT
    Judge Pauffley reveals, in paras 107 and 108 of her judgement, her knowledge concerning the concealment of crucially important evidence by DC Rogers during the investigation, which prevented investigating police officers access to this crucial evidence. Despite her knowledge of this “curious fact” (the Judge’s own words), Judge Pauffley CONTINUED with the hearing, when her only lawful option was to call a halt as the hearing was evidently incomplete and seriously compromised. The continuation of the hearing was/ is WILFUL CONTEMPT of the law. The Judge then went on to describe the police investigation as “wide-ranging”(para 9. of judgement) – a claim which is clearly FRAUDULENT.
    Unlike the police officers and social services during the investigation, Judge Pauffley WAS able to view “a dozen or so short film clips of the children being questioned by Ms Draper and Mr Christie and listened to the very lengthy audio recording.” (para 21. of judgement). However, it seems the Judge did NOT view the video clips containing the children’s detailed descriptions and drawings of the distinguishing marks on and around the private parts of the adults named by the children as their attackers, as she makes no mention of these anywhere in her twenty-page “fact-finding” judgement. This was a deliberately selective review of the video clip evidence with the intention to continue to conceal the fact the children were able to describe – and had described – distinguishing marks on and around their named attacker’s genitals. Again, FRAUD.
    Consultant Paediatrician Dr Deborah Hodes’ report CONFIRMED the children’s allegations of inflicted anal injury from insertion of a blunt instrument of penetrative force, which were consistent with both children’s allegations of sexual abuse. Judge Pauffley’s response to this concrete evidence was a disgraceful attempt to rubbish Dr Hode’s report and to launch a vile ad hominem attack, stating: “The court must always be on guard against the over-dogmatic expert…” Such tactics are beneath contempt.

    Judge Pauffley’s judgement was/is designed to deceive and mislead the public, and is nothing more than a sham. It is fraud at such a loathsome level that it is sickening to all decent human beings.
    These crimes of fraud by these three public servants have put at risk of harm not only ella draper’s two young children, but children everywhere, and therefore all human beings.
    Their crimes are also a betrayal of public trust. As one of the public, I inform you, Director of Public Prosecutions, of the public interest in prosecuting Judge Mrs Anna Pauffley, Detective Inspector Cannon and Detective Constable Rogers for perpetrating the very serious crime of fraud, without delay.

    from one of the public, and a conscious living being,

    Drifloud 20th April, 2015 contact address: email: drifloud@

    EVIDENCE: The mobile phone film recordings showing the children naming their attackers, and giving detailed knowledge of distinguishing marks on and around each of their named attackers’ private parts can be delivered to your office, along with the medical reports and police interviews of the children.
    All the other evidence incriminating Judge Pauffley, DC Rogers and DI Cannon can be found in the Judge’s own words taken from her “Care Proceedings: Fact Finding” judgement made public, 19th day of March, year 2015 – in particular the following two paragraphs:
    107.”It is a curious fact that prior to the launch of these proceedings, no police officer had listened to the audio recording made by Jean Clement Yaohirou or watched the film clips of the children. DI Cannon made inquiries at my request to discover that DC Rogers, the member of his team who received the film clips and the audio recording from Mr Yaohirou, had sent them to a property store in Chingford. The focus would appear to have been upon arranging almost immediate ABE interviews.”
    108. “I say no more at this stage than that the police and social services inquiry could have taken an entirely different course if attention had been given to those recordings. At the very least, the questions asked of P and Q at interview would have been directed towards other areas of interest.”

    Liked by 2 people

  2. We have Magna Carta 1215 Article 61 to cite we have no Queen because she has committed high treason against England the Common wealth of Great Britain. Elizabeth Windsor, two has international arrest warrants outstanding for her arrest for crimes against humanity. You are asking those who have no authority to oversee cases of paedophilia, satanic abuse of children while conforming to their cunning. They are treasonous we have no Queen so no judges or police just gangsters who rule by fear and use the police ordered by enablers high up in the force to stop investigations. Arrest the Judge for treason committing fraud via misrepresentation use Article 61.

    Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights 1689 set out our RIGHTS. Parliament CANNOT revoke them.
    Article 61 Magna Carta is the Constitutional Safeguard to protect the people from a corrupt or tyrannical government.

    Article 61 was correctly invoked by the Barons’ Committee in 2001.The Queen failed to respond according to her constitutional and contractual duty. Britain therefore continues to remain in Lawful Rebelion to this day.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Thanks, Sabine, but I should have made it clearer that the video already had 700K views – we don’t yield that influence yet! I wish…..Jx

    Like

  4. Do you honestly believe criminals aiding and abetting each other are going to investigate their own crimes I don’t think so! They’re more than likely blocked emails to them so your just meeting keep it shut. What I have put above about MC 1215 is for real, it’s about treason too a life sentence. If there were enough we could arrest them lawfully under common law but you have to give your Oath to a Baron to be protected under MC1215 Article 61. This is the law get a grip, for real. There power comes from the Queen but she gave it up via treason. The foot soldier police won’t know of this and just follow orders but the Judge will and know that she has no defence. What have you to loose, you to use everything possible.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Hi, are the children ok? I’m just a mum who feels deeply for both children… are there court dates? are the grandparents trying to get them? Is their mum ok and will she be able to get them without being arrested first? Is there a government body that you guys wanna the concerned public (around the world) to send letters to?? Who is caring for the children??? when is the legal age to be free from adults caring for you in the UK? Since I’ve watched their vids I can stop thinking of their ordeal. they are in my prayers

    Liked by 2 people

  6. ref. arkofgod
    May 14, 2015 at 10:40 am I agree it would be helpful to have a practical update on the LEGAL moves to appeal the Pauffley judgement either by appeal or judicial review as these are the only routes by which they will be returned to mother/grand parents. Also what is the state of the Met Police challenge? With all the peripheral RSA stuff it is easy to forget there are two small children at the centre of this effectively imprisoned, segregated from their mother and forced to meet the one (at least) person who has terrorised them. What information is there about their current situation/welfare/contact arrangements? In particular are they together or have they been separated. Someone needs to keep a documented record for future reference as there are some people who may have some explaining to do a little later on.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. I agree with breakawayfrom. Any and every law that can be used against these criminals should be. If they can be legally arrested by citizens, then citizens should plan on doing so. Criminals aid and abet each other, especially this level of criminals. Waiting for a corrupt and controlled police force to do their job is entirely the wrong way to go.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. This is a good video i came across that explains what we’re all up against via the police justice system. Just criminals looking out for others, where money talks poor person walks. The video goes on about private prosecutions where you can take anyone to Court no matter how high up they are. The video says how can you get convictions if you can’t trust the police.

    Like

  9. Here is the proof the Queen Committed treason against the British people and so Judges are doing so too fraud by misrepresentation. Basically they have no power, the children in family courts are being unlawfully removed by those who are treasonous they should hang.

    Like

  10. Here is further proof they have no more power than you or me https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_queens_forefeiture_of_the_cr#incoming-478775

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Will3/12-13/2

    What does it mean? Forget the double think and the conformism, i know we are all born our parent and so on to conform obey. They have no power only via consent same as i give you consent to drive my car. They have stolen from each and everyone of us for centuries using lies and cunning to do so. They rely on the fact that some know the truth, but the mass don’t. What we are up against is finding a way to get tem out into the open and use our laws to do whatever

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s