A good ‘nutshell analysis’ of the judgment! Except the blogger doesn’t realise that Judge Vera Mayer initiated everything in Barnet Court what Mrs Justice Anna Pauffley perpetuated in the High Court.
Reblogged from https://alanwrightson.wordpress.com/2015/04/03/anna-pauffley-paedophile-burger-man/ which has since been set to PRIVATE, i.e. you must request access.
There are so many unexplainable decisions in Anna Pauffley´s mistreatment of Ella Draper and her two children that the time has come to openly state what many people must surely suspect already: that Anna Pauffley is one of those people in high places who the VIP paedophile network in the UK depend on to continue doing what they do. The following is a list of inexplicable facts which corroborate the idea that Pauffley is working for paedophiles:
• Quite astonishingly, she never interviewed the children, or asked them who they wanted to live with.
• She took them away from the only person who wasn´t implicated in the abuse, and chose to increase the contact they had with the only person implicated in the
• The police closed the case as “no crime confirmed” whilst still waiting for the results of the medical examination of the children!
• When these results were in, the case was not re-opened in line with those results.
• Those results said there had definitely been long-term child abuse. This supported the children´s claims, yet Anna Pauffley in her judgement attacked the expert doctor who made those reports, as if she herself was medically qualified! This is outrageous and shows a clear prior-decision to discredit the children and mother, ignore all presented, even expert evidence, and keep the children in contact with their abusive father.
• Without any investigation whatsoever, and without interviewing Ella or Abraham Christie, her boyfriend, the judge declared that they had been abusing the children. All this, with no police investigation to back her decision up, and with all the evidence to the contrary!
• She accused the mother and her partner of coaching the children, again with no evidence. In fact, the story was so complicated that nobody could have coached them to that degree.
• She said the children were in a custody battle, as if to explain why Ella and Abraham would want to be coaching them. Yet Ella already had custody of the children, so this is blatantly a deliberate misdirection by Pauffley to support her own assertions.
• None of the accused abusers have been medically examined to see if the children´s claims of distinguishing marks on their genitals are true. Why did Pauffley or the police not arrange for this? It would have proved abuse claims once and for all, categorically.
• She called the mother evil, when it is clear from the interviews she has done that she is no such thing. In other words, Anna Pauffley has resorted to sensationalist, inflammatory remarks to try and cover-up the paucity of reason behind her outrageous decision-making.
• The mother´s stories of domestic abuse at the hands of Ricky Dearman, head of the paedophile cult according to the children, and the past court-orders she had taken
out to protect herself from him were completely ignored by the judge Rather, she took the children from the mother into care and increased the amount of time they were to spend with this abusive man, despite the proven, prior domestic violence he undertook on her.
• This man, Ricky Dearman, the children´s father, told the children to try and kill their mother. One of the things they did was to put excrement on their food to try and poison her and her partner. Is this something which the mother herself would ask them to do? Who, then?
Ricky Dearman, the person the judge wants them to spend more time with!
• Pauffley put the hours and hours of coherent abuse video-evidence down to the children watching an adventure movie. This is utterly incredible from an evidenciary point of view, because whoever showed them a movie with such evil themes would have to be involved in paedophile-related activities, anyway.
One or two of these points, amidst the arguments of a standard courtroom case, would not be indicative of anything. But there are so many of them, and furthermore they are all easily refuted by the evidence – which is available in the public domain, and yet which Anna Pauffley has absolutely excluded from her reasoning process.
Therefore, I must conclude that Anna Pauffley is either a paedophile or a paedophile supporter. I believe she must be investigated to find out whether she is one of the following:
• an active paedophile
• friends with active paedophiles
• working as a defensive layer for an active paedophile network
• or perhaps just the most ignorant, incompetent, nasty old bag that has ever worked in a courtroom (this last point is not mutually exclusive from the other ones, however).
Because one way or another, she has made damn sure that Alisa and Gabriel have been kept away from an extraordinarily good mother, and has increased their contact with a man who used to beat up their mother, forced them to kill trafficked-babies, made them drink their blood (Alisa: “It tasted metallic”) taught them secret languages so they could clandestinely get away from their mother to touch each other privately, passed them round to hundreds of paedophiles in Hampstead since they were much younger, sodomized them regularly for years, taught Alisa to steal money, befriended the teachers at Hampstead Primary school and probably initiated them into sharing his hideous urges, and many other things.
Yet where is this man?
Not only at large, but being feted by Anna Pauffley as worthy of increased contact with them, whilst MI5 sends round thugs to terrify Ella so much she leaves the country under threat of arrest.
For what? Reporting her ex-husband´s abuse of her children! And with Anna Pauffley overseeing things, the intimidation stetches not only to the mother and her partner, but Sabine, her representative in court, and then even Belinda McKenzie, the head of the McKenzie-friend association!
This woman is trying to remove every form of natural protection there is for those children, so that they are at the mercy of strangers and a corrupt social services system. It is absolutely plain that Ella, Abraham and Sabine were frightened out of the country by the police and MI5 (probably working under Anna Pauffley´s paedophile masters) precisely so that the children would have no protection in this country, and be left alone and vulnerable.
As I have said, child abuse is now government policy in the UK, and children from incest-troubled families are being actively targetted by the social services and fast-tracked as in the Gabriel and Alisa´s case, in order to sexually feed the filth attached to the social services networks in high places – celebrities, power-brokers and politicians, all of which activity is directed at a high level by the UK intelligence services so that they have blackmail material over all those powerful people.
In other words, evil old bags like Anna Pauffley, in league with an institutionally corrupt social services, police and mainstream-media, all working under the British intelligence services, are attacking everyone who stands up for innocent abused children, and are knowingly sacrificing those children to the sickest in society, using the sacrificial dagger of bureaucracy – a very “modern, western and far more civilized” way of doing it than in the Greek, Roman or even Aztec days.
After all, that blood does make such a mess of one´s Persian carpets.
“Anna, do pass the baby, dear, I´m hungry”.
Anna Pauffley, burger-man for the modern, hard-working