Vid 15: Dearman Ruled Molester in 2010

Advertisements

74 thoughts on “Vid 15: Dearman Ruled Molester in 2010

  1. Obtaining ex parte an “emergency” non-molestation order, does not amount to a court “ruling” that anybody has actually molested anybody else, in any way at all.

    The court would not have needed to “agree” that Ricky was a “dangerous abuser”, in order to rubber stamp an “emergency” non-mol order, obtained (as a precaution, just in case their might have been some fragment of truth in Ella’s allegations) at a hearing that poor Ricky would not even have known was being held, until the “emergency order” was served upon him afterwards, in many a case prohibiting a respondent deprived of the opportunity to respond, from doing things he had never done before, and would never have dreamt of doing in a month of Sundays.

    Our family court system in the UK really is that evil and corrupt! Sometimes Sabine is up in arms about that evil and corruption. At other times, she is happy to reap perceived propaganda benefits from that sad state of affairs, going along with the evil and corruption, when it suits her to do so, as now, I am willing to wager. Sabine ought by now to understand well enough the evil and corruption, and what (I suspect) she is doing here.

    Oh the depths that those who desire to deprive P and Q of the only of their two parents who is still there for them are willing to plumb, in their smear tactics, against Ricky! Have they learnt so little, in all their years of study of injustice, delivered by the UK’s evil and corrupt family courts?

    I am willing today to bet Sabine £50 that the “emergency order” is likely to have been of limited duration, and that R|cky promptly requested an inter partes hearing, to prevent it from becoming a durable non-molestation order. Sabine, please post the durable non-mol if one was ever issued, and send me your bank details, if I am set to lose this bet. An emergency non-mol, as proof of wrong-doing, isn’t even worth the paper it is written on, readers.

    Wake up!

    Liked by 1 person

    • And wake up, Mr. Allman!

      In the court of public opinion, this court order and the witness statement are both indications that the problems with Mr D. did not suddenly start with the accusation of satanic abuse last year. Please tell me what kind of loving parent threatens the children with being killed if they report on what he is doing, and indeed thereafter leaves them for half an hour on the central reservation of a busy main road in London as a punishment for having not wanted to see him? This was reported by the children in their statements to the police. They also reported witnessing him kneeling on their mother’s head and her screaming for her eldest child to call the police. So I think we have some idea of the character we are dealing with here.

      Sorry to disappoint you, Mr A, but the truth will out. Frankly, a tip to the alleged satanists and the police and judiciary allegedly covering up: it’s never a good idea to pick on middle-class, educated people because – unfortunately – they tend to be articulate and keep good records, even if, as in Ella’s case, they are of foreign origin. We can see and hear Ella’s education and intelligence in everything she says. (I am not here denigrating others who may not enjoy the benefits of a good education, just pointing out that they tend to become easy victims of police abuses).

      I do not know the truth of what is going on here, but I do know that the police and judiciary cover up wrongdoing – that is now public knowledge – and we also know that children have been abused all over Britain and Ireland in huge numbers. So let’s just suspend judgement and let us all demand, as per the precautionary principle and in the best interests of these two lovely, bright, trilingual and troubled children, that the authorities stop harassing Ella, Abraham and Sabine, give the children into the loving care of their grandparents for removal to Russia, where a happy home awaits them, and start investigating what has gone on here instead of covering it up. How about interviewing the other kids named as being involved? How about asking the accused to come forward and prove that they do not have significant distinguishing features on their private parts – or indeed scars where these might have been recently removed? Withiut a proper investigation, we are left to conclude that something is horribly wrong.

      Cone on, Mr A, if you, too, are not looking for a compassionate solution for this family, then I wonder what your motive for commenting really is.

      Like

    • I wonder why, police, SS, caffcas,soliciters and families courts treat the poor and the victims like shit snd rugs. A and G are the victimas, they are been fisical and sexual abused…. The evidences are there, doesn’t matter WHO abused this kids. Mr Dearman is a criminal And the judge ignored this facts

      Like

      • Mr. Dearman lost the custody of his kids years ago for a reason !!!

        If Abrain is ones of the abusers, why he wasn’t arest last September ….. Police nerver interview him …. Why the courts took so long to send the police to arest Ella and Sabine? Luckily they run away in time. Doesnt make sence. Everybody can see the authorities are COVER UP the truth and blame the mother to brainwash the kids… Please 7 and 8 years old do not make up stories about ritual sex and killings babes … The kids words are reall, only a adult person who are been watching ritual videos after videos can describe the facts

        Like

        • @ Maria

          Neither Ms Draper and Mr Dearman has never had, gained, or lost custody of their children together. There is no such such thing as “custody” in UK family law. Custody was abolished in 1989, over ten years before Ms Draper and Mr Dearman had their two lovely children together.

          Your other questions, addressed to me, are not well-informed as to how the police operate. Courts seldom “send” the police to arrest suspects. Moreover, they are not questions that I can answer, any more than you can.

          This said, if the police had been a bit more efficient, instead of sending to a cupboard in Chingford the only footage they had of Ellan and Abe toturing P and Q in the UK, the rest of the torture that was filmed having been filmed overseas, and therefore out of the UK jurisdiction, it is possible that Ella and Abe would be remanded in custody now, awaiting criminal trial, for torturing Ricky and Ella’s poor children together.

          Like

    • John, please stop offering ££ to Sabine…. For what? Sabine is not a beggar. She is a lady who had the guts to stand up in European Parliament talking about our kids rights FORCED ADOPTIONS and KIDS IN CARE without a voice. UK got 100s of journalists and human rights people but not without guts like Sabine

      Like

      • @ Maria

        Sabine doesn’t have to accept my £50. She ought to put up or shut up though. Where is the finding of fact order, that implicates Ricky as a molester, assuming one trusts the corrupt family courts when they make findings of fact one wants to be true, for a change? Sabine hasn’t got a copy of any such order. No such order exists, I am willing to bet my £50 stake.

        At the moment, P and Q are merely subject to an Emergency Protection Order, or an interim care order, I believe, and subject to ongoing care proceedings brought by social services, as far as I recall. Whether P and Q will remain in care once these care proceedings are concluded, is a question that the courts haven’t addressed yet, because the High Court needed to make findings of fact about the torture and SRA allegations, which it has now done.

        I hope that P and will safely be living with their dad Ricky Dearman before long. I hope that Ella does not lose all contact with them, permanently. Mind you, she deserves to, by all reliable accounts. But P and Q deserve to have the chance to restore their damaged relationship with their mother, once they have restored their damaged relationship with their father, who must be presumed innocent of everything criminal that he has been accused of. (Do you understand the word “must”?)

        If you aren’t capable of presuming Ricky to be innocent, then I’m afraid that you ought not to be commenting upon this unhappy, broken family. Your inablility to make the only morally correct assumption, that Ricky is and always has been innocent, disqualifies you from forming a fair, objective opinion, as to what sort of outcome happier than the present temporary status quo (P and Q with foster carers, in touch with dad, mum disappeared), or the nightmare existence from which P and Q have been rescued, to hope and pray for, for these two cute little children, who come across to me as resourceful survivors..

        Like

        • Oh that would be delightful, never mind his ideas of being a really good dad, he is unemployed, drives a battered old car, never been able to support them, gave them a tenner and then said you gotta learn, um uh uh the value of money, not surprising he is unemployed, he is an actor…..and not too many parts either, I suppose the child benefits may come in handy, perhaps he could a nice little council house in Rotherham and they can all live happily ever after

          Like

      • We all know what is going on. For the first time in many years, allegations of (literal) witchcraft in Hampstead on the part of Ricky Dearman and others, have made it necessary for a British court to conduct a (literal) witch hunt, an area of law in which the British judiciary are decidedly out of practice. Some are disappointed that the official witch hunt in the High Court failed to capture any witches, and would like to conduct their own private witch hunt on the internet, whilst imploring the authorities to begin again its official hunt for the Hampstead witches, and to make a more “full and thorough” job of it next time.

        Is anybody in disagreement that this is what is going on?

        Like

  2. @Maria

    “So let’s just suspend judgement and let us all demand, as per the precautionary principle and in the best interests of these two lovely, bright, trilingual and troubled children, that the authorities stop harassing Ella, Abraham and Sabine, give the children into the loving care of their grandparents for removal to Russia, where a happy home awaits them, and start investigating what has gone on here instead of covering it up. How about interviewing the other kids named as being involved? How about asking the accused to come forward and prove that they do not have significant distinguishing features on their private parts – or indeed scars where these might have been recently removed? Withiot a proper investigation, we are left to conclude that something is horribly wrong.
    Come on, Mr A, if you, too, are not looking for a compassionate solution for this family, then I wonder what your motive for commenting really is.”

    Very true, Maria – that’s exactly what we have been talking about all along.

    Like

  3. Sabine, please upload the durable or permanent non-mol obtained inter partes, before the temporary non-mol order expired. Presumably this was obtained after a “full and thorough investigation”, and a full hearing of the disputed matter on the part of an impartial court. A hearing that Ricky knew would be taking place, and was invited to attend. And then send me your bank details, so that I can send you the £50 I promised to send you, once you had uploaded the durable or permanent, inter partes non-mol order.

    Like

  4. This case requires a proper, full, and PUBLIC investigation. It HAS to be public because the authorities can no longer be trusted in any way shape or form.

    I will believe that “poor Ricky” is the victim here when a full and PUBLIC investigation provides evidence that supports “poor Ricky’s” innocence.

    Meanwhile, God only knows what is happening to those children at the moment because we surely do not.

    And as for Allman, one can almost hear his glee in being able to proclaim that the non-molestation order was probably temporary, uncontested and therefore meaningless. Well, the temporary nature of the order hardly needed to be pointed out because the expiration date for that order was clearly stated on the document as 7th October 2010. Allman’s interests in this case, as indicated by his unswerving support for Dearman, are questionable

    Regarding the validity of a non-molestation order against Dearman, the question really should be this. If Dearman did not attend the hearing for the non-molestation order because he was ignorant of the case being heard, then why did he not do anything about it to clear his name and good standing afterwards. If, after being informed of the order, he did not do anything about it then we might consider perhaps that there was some truth in Ella Draper’s claims and “poor Ricky” didn’t have a leg to stand on.

    Poor Ricky eh! It’s a shame for the lad.

    Like

    • @ Sickened

      “Allman’s interests in this case, as indicated by his unswerving support for Dearman, are questionable.”

      You are right that I support Mr Dearman, against others here who have been assuming Mr Dearman to be guilty until proven innocent, and thereafter guilty despite having been proven innocent, or (as I put it) guilty until proven guilty, and beyond. I do not consider these unwarranted assumptions, and the sheer witch hunt against Mr Dearman on the part of those who make those assumptions, be in

      1) Mr Dearman’s interests,
      2) P and Q’s interests
      3) the interests of justice,
      4) the interests of the movement to expose real SRA,
      5) the interests of the movement to expose the corruption of our family courts (except, if we take notice of Sabine, when issuing temporary, emergency non-molestation orders ex parte), or
      6) the interests of the movement to expose the prevalence and harm of parental alienation.

      My support for Mr Dearman is therefore, as you put it, unswerving.

      If you think that any of the six above-listed interests that I admit having in this case is “questionable”, please get on with the task of questioning that interest of mine. Which of the six interests I have listed is it *possible* for you to “question” from the moral high ground, WITHOUT (and this is the important bit) making the very *assumption* of Mr Dearman’s guilt that runs through most of the comments on this and similar blogs like the lettering in a stick of rock? The downright wicked assumption that sickens *me* every time I come across it?

      Liked by 1 person

  5. @ Sickened

    “If Dearman did not attend the hearing for the non-molestation order because he was ignorant of the case being heard, then why did he not do anything about it to clear his name and good standing afterwards[?]”

    I have offered Sabine £50, if she uploads the durable or permanent non-molestation order that the court will have issued after what people here fondly call a “full investigation”, and an inter partes hearing, unless Mr Dearman did a runner. If Sabine does not accept my £50, we may safely take it that Mr Dearman’s name WAS fully “cleared”, by 7th October 2010 or thereabouts, when the court refused to issue Ms Draper any such order.

    If Sabine does upload the missing order, she will receive £50 from me, even if she fails to explain why she has such faith in our family courts – full of praise for them – when they take Ella’s side against Rick in 2010, but not, for some reason, when they take Ricky’s side against Ella, in 2015 – when the same courts are thoroughly corrupt, in here flexible opinion.

    Like

    • What type a man are u to offer £ to Sabine, are u bribing her? She is not s child.
      SS use to bribe kids to keep their lies and sex abusers bribe the victimas with ££ and sweets.
      Your opinions about Sabine and the Hampstead kids case are not important

      Like

      • @ Maria

        “Your opinions about … the Hampstead kids case are not important”

        How do you set about deciding whether this or that person’s opinions, about this or that subject, are (as you put it) “important”?

        Important to whom, and for what purposes?

        My opinion was obviously important at one stage to Sabine, because she asked me for it, and thanked me for the work I did to ensure that mine was the informed opinion that I thought Sabine needed to hear from me. She thanked me for giving her my opinion.

        Is your opinion more important than mine? If so, why?

        Is your opinion better-informed than mine? If so, how?

        Like

  6. “1) to 6) My support for Mr Dearman is therefore, as you put it, unswerving.“ (John Allman)
    Besides the point as almost always.

    The point is: How come that John Allman is not in support of Ella’s, Abraham’s, Sabine’s and the children’s rights and interests? He is? No, actually he is not even in support of the children’s rights and interests (as he claims he is) Why is it that John Allman is fully satisfied with a very superficial “investigation“ (which means none) by the police? Why is he not the least interested in having a proper and thorough criminal investigation/inquiry into serious allegations of ritual child abuse, rape and murder? Why is it that he stubbornly ignores everything vital? The complete cover-up, the witch-hunt by police, judiciary, controlled media… against Ella, Abraham, the McKenzieFriends and even Sabine? WHY IS IT that Allman’s unswerving support is reserved for alleged ritual child rapers and murderers only?

    Like

  7. John Allman
    April 6, 2015 at 4:05 pm
    @Maria

    “This said, if the police had been a bit more efficient, instead of sending to a cupboard in Chingford the only footage they had of Ellan and Abe torturing P and Q in the UK, the rest of the torture that was filmed having been filmed overseas, and therefore out of the UK jurisdiction, it is possible that Ella and Abe would be remanded in custody now, awaiting criminal trial, for torturing Ricky and Ella’s poor children together.“

    and there you go!
    Rambling on just the same about “torture” using a highly defamatory term in order to smear Ella’s and Abraham’s name and trying to criminalize them. What a sham!
    You just make it up as you go along. False, made-up “FACTS” of “WATER TORTURE“(as you call it) without clarifying your claim. What did this “torture“ look like? What did Abraham do exactly? Typical disinformation agent tactics. You are SO busted! My answer here:

    https://whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/04/01/dear-mp-childsexualabuse-csa-is-an-election-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-1376

    As to the “spoon flicks“ – That’s something I neither comprehend nor condone.
    But don’t forget: We are talking about ritual sexual rape and murder of children A. and G were not allowed to talk about! They had a deal with their father to keep quiet.
    Public interest, truth and justice must be served. A thorough criminal investigation is needed – and Ricky Dearman among other alleged abusers (rather than Ella &Abe) should be remanded in custody awaiting criminal trial …

    Like

    • JOHN ALMAN, kids plaiyng water fights is a game, but when is parents playing is torture, I remind you was Summer, so the kids and parents dolay games. Ella snd Abrain used this games to get the truth from the kids … Why not… A slap with the metal spoon, the same spoon the kids used to put poo on the food … Why not….. TORTURE was the way police interview this kids without proper adult present ant late on the night … Criminals and terrorist got more rights.
      Ritual sex abuse and killings babes is nothing, police are more interesting in investigate water fights

      Like

  8. Allman said:

    “If Sabine does not accept my £50, we may safely take it that Mr Dearman’s name WAS fully “cleared”, by 7th October 2010 or thereabouts, when the court refused to issue Ms Draper any such order.”

    We can in no way take it that Dearman was ‘cleared’ by the 7th of October. It could equally, and I would say more probably, be the case that Draper just did not bother to follow up on it. If Allman has evidence that Dearman did indeed fight the order and clear his name, then let him put it forward. If Allman has evidence that Draper made any attempt for that order to be further continued, and was refused, then let him show it. But I think not.

    I do not know Dearman, Draper, or Christie, but I do know this, those poor bloody children are not in safe hands and it is of great concern to me that they might be in serious danger of one kind or another. THE WELFARE OF THOSE CHILDREN HAS, OF NECESSITY, BECOME A PUBLIC ISSUE BECAUSE WE CANNOT TRUST THE AUTHORITIES ANY LONGER REGARDING THE WELFARE OF THESE, OR ANY OTHER CHILDREN.

    We have seen what the authorities have done and continue to do to Melanie Shaw.

    We have seen what the authorities have done and continue to do to Hollie Greig.

    We have seen what the authorities have done and continue to do to Robert Green.

    Now, I don’t know what has gone on here but I feel reasonably certain that those children have been sexually abused. I don’t know Ella Draper, but she seems to me to be an intelligent, well educated woman, with some alternative nutrition ideas, and pretty poor taste in men. I don’t know Christie, but if he had hit and bruised one of my kids he would be through the door. As for Ricky Dearman, my impression is that he is a bit of a self-interested, narcissistic wannabe actor, who seems to have money but is rarely employed, and I wonder where does he get the money from, and what financial stability has he ever given these children anyway? As far as I am aware Dearman does not even have a home of his own. And what emotional stability has he ever given them?

    So, if Allman knows so much about “poor Ricky’s” ability to provide a stable, safe and loving environment he should let us know, because we are all concerned first and foremost, with safety and well being of those poor children .

    Like

    • @ Sickened

      An emergency non-molestation order in itself does not require the respondent to “clear” his or her “name”., because it does not imply that the respondent was “ruled” to be “molester” in the first place. That is a serious misrepresentation of what the granting of an emergency non-molestation order requires to be proved, and what such an order actually means. That is what is wrong with this latest attack upon Mr Dearman’s character. If there was no non-emergency non-molestation order, then Mr Dearman was never “ruled” by any court to be a “molester”.

      What have the people here got against Ricky Dearman? Not one single allegation against him has ever been substantiated, has it? There has been as full an investigation as is needed, followed by an eleven-day court hearing.

      Why cannot people simply accept the fact that Ricky has always been the good dad that P and Q have admitted he has always been to them? Why aren’t people PLEASED to learn that all these horrendous allegations against Ricky were lies, made up by Ella and Abe, which P and Q were tortured into memorising in Morocco, and filmed (in Morocco) making on video, on pain of further torture, and repeating to the police (at first) after their return to the UK? Why do people still have, in the 21st century, this disturbing emotional need to have somebody innocent to suspect of witchcraft?

      Like

      • “Why cannot people simply accept the fact that Ricky has always been the good dad that P and Q have admitted he has always been to them?”

        The following are selections of the transcript of the ABE police interview of September 17, 2014, as found at http://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/01/hampstead-analysis-of-the-september-17th-police-interview/:

        “We talked in two other interviews didn’t we?”
        “Yeah”
        “Was what you told me the truth?”
        “Yeah”
        “So all that stuff about the babies….”
        “Yeah.”
        “and the Church and all that?”
        “No the babies, well the babies, there is some of the babies killed yeah.”
        “OK, are you sure?”
        “Yes, but not much, not every single day, not every single day killed no. Not like that.”

        Indeed, what a sterling father your friend Ricky Dearman makes.

        ““Cos I heard you watched a film Zorro, is that right?””
        “Yeah.”
        “and there was someone kill…. killed there, someone was killed there, weren’t there?… Because it sounded to me like, what it sounded to me was similar to the story you told about the babies. And that’s why I was a bit (sic) wondering, are babies actually killed?”
        “Yeah”

        “Are babies being killed?”
        ”No, not much but there is yeah.”
        “By who?”
        “By my dad. Not much.”

        Like

      • Allman asks

        “Why cannot people simply accept the fact that Ricky has always been the good dad that P and Q have admitted he has always been to them? Why aren’t people PLEASED to learn that all these horrendous allegations against Ricky were lies….”.

        Well I would answer (yet again) that it should be obvious to even the most dim witted person out there, that (watch my lips John) THIS CASE HAS NOT BEEN INVESTIGATED IN ANY MEANINGFUL WAY, AND THEREFORE THE ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THE CHILDREN SHOULD BE ACCEPTED AS TRUTHFUL UNTIL A THOROUGH AND PROPER PUBLIC INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED, IN WHICH NO STONE IS LEFT UNTURNED.

        You speak of “poor Ricky”, the innocent father. Let’s be clear about this, the only innocent victims in this grotesque scenario are the two children who have without doubt been sexually assaulted and who are currently trapped within a corrupt state system that is infested with paedophiles, their protectors, and apologists.

        So let’s put our energies into finding out what the hell has actually been going on, and who is responsible for it.

        Like

        • @ Sickened

          The problem with your insistence that, “THE ALLEGATIONS MADE BY THE CHILDREN SHOULD BE ACCEPTED AS TRUTHFUL [UNTIL …]”, is that the children have made serious allegations against Ricky, which they subsequently contradicted, and against Ella and Abe, which they did not subsequently contradict. Under these circumstances, if one adopts your favoured approach, the children cannot safely be “returned” to either of their parents, perhaps ever. I would not wish that upon them. Would you?

          I have no criticism that Ms Pauffley conducted a witch hunt, witchcraft in Hampstead having been alleged. But there is an ambiguity as to what criteria people here apply, who consider inadequate the official witch hunt that culminated in an eleven day fact-finding hearing, finding neither witches nor witchcraft in Hampstead.

          If people have concrete criticisms of the procedure adopted, such that an improved witch-hunting procedure might have found witches rather than failing to find witches, that is fine. But much of the discontent seems to based upon disappointment that the official witch hunt found no witches, rather than alleged flaws in the procedure that assured its failure to find (for example) that Ricky Dearman had been practising witchcraft with and upon his children..

          Like

  9. Sickened, I agree with u … A and G are in danger.
    Some kids abused by Westminster paedos desaper without a trace,some ones got killed…
    One thing I’m sure wasn’t ME or YOU

    Like

  10. Touching the “allman” is a tar baby and a COMPLETE waste of time.

    He knows nothing of value and considers a bunch of silly ‘beings’ in wigs as his authority.

    Those WIGS are not my authority, let them be his authority, obviously he needs them to defend his lifestyle and inability to know things for himself, pathetic more than anything.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Google the Martensville and McMartin Satanic abuse cases…its not out of the realm of possibility these children told half truths or embellished some or all of the claims…tell me, if you think that feeding cannabis to developing brains of children and hitting them with spoons might not be a useful tool in brainwashing. Tell me you’ve never heard of MK Ultra or Monarch programming?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Here we go again with another bloody shill!

      Folks, I was just about to reply to this Heather Martin but I don’t have time to spare that can be wasted on inane comments such as the above.

      As a mother, and as a normal, decent human being, who has no interest in causing harm to others, I have deep concerns that there is an ongoing cover up over what has really gone on here, and I will not give up arguing these concerns until a fully transparent and clearly visible proper investigation has been completed.

      And until I, not John Allman, not Heather Martin, but I, am satisfied that these children’s interests have been served I will continue to follow this case and do whatever I can to help get to the truth.

      We don’t need to be wasting time on people whose interests are questionable. What we should be doing is working to co-ordinate our efforts in the pursuit of safety for these children.

      Where there is any doubt, and there is so much to doubt here, I will always, always, err on the side of the children, and the claims they originally made. That the children retracted these claims after having been under the influence of social services and the police, is worrying. And whichever half-wit came up with the ludicrous idea of the influence of the movie Zorro in forming their ideas for the accusations, should be fired for sheer stupidity.

      Please do not be drawn into the net cast by Allman and Martin. Ignore them and they will go away.

      Like

      • @ Sickened

        I do not suppose, for one moment, that the police made a lucky guess, when they questioned the children about the plot of The Mask of Zorro, on the off-chance that these children’s mother had allowed such young children to watch a horror movie of that genre, and that particular one to boot. The idea you call “ludicrous”, that the content of their allegations in part came from that movie, must surely have come from the children’s own revelation that they had watched that movie.

        I have “liked” your comment, in which you quote Ephesians 6:12. I am glad that you perceive yourself to have awoken from a “coma”, and that you have come to realise that the world is nothing like what you thought it was. Me too, and Heather Martin too, whose blog is worth a read, I have discovered.

        You seem to be on the right path, if you are trying to let the Christian scriptures shape your attitudes. However, there are other scriptures that you should also allow to shape your attitudes, besides the single verse you quoted. I would be honoured to engage in email with you about those additional insights that other passages from the same writers (i.e. apostles like Paul) offer, which I wish you would also apply.

        The history of allegations of witchcraft, all too readily believed, and investigated by witch hunts conducted in fleshly wrath deceived into to identifying itself as righteous indignation, is littered with the martyrdom of the innocent, and the embarrassment of the well-meaning complicit, who, swept away by the mood of the moment, would have been honoured to light the fires that burnt the so-called witches themselves, but who later felt remorse even to have been spectators, because they realised that they and their leaders had acted in prejudice, and done the work of Satan himself, all the while intending to serve God, but not thinking straight.

        “Man’s anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires.” [James]

        “The archangel Michael, disputing with the devil … did not dare to risk bringing a false accusation against [even the devil].” [Jude]

        You cannot outwit the forces of darkness in your own strength and wisdom. You might as well be David, trying to fight Goliath wearing Saul’s armour. You need the whole counsel of God, published in the whole bible, rather than just this one verse, which you are using to justify your “sickened” mood, and your prejudice against Ricky, and in favour of Ella and Abe.

        The coached testimony of children was used to convict many an alleged witch, burnt at the stake by excitable adults who felt proud of their anger at the time, and ashamed only on reflection, as they listened to the dying prayers of the innocents executed, audible through the flames. Only when they realised what they had been part of, did they repent, too late to save the mortal lives of their innocent victims.

        Detecting witchcraft has always been an error-prone occupation, which has likely claimed the lives of more true Christian believers than ever it has real witches. Witch hunting It is no less error-prone in Hampstead in the 21st century, than it was throughout Europe, in the Middle Ages. That is part of the reason why witch-hunting went out of fashion for so long, before a recent revival of the witch-hunting industry in modern times. That is why we should be slow to feel nostalgia for earlier ages, when there seemed to be so much more that the common people could do to eradicate witchcraft, provided that the occasional injustice was not considered too high a price to pay.

        Ricky Dearman is accused of witchcraft. You think that he is probably guilty, and I think that he is almost certainly either innocent, or impossible to convict, and therefore entitled to be treated as innocent.

        It is a common error amongst witch-hunters, to feel as though they want (so-to-speak) to burn the “defence lawyers” of those whom they are prosecuting for witchcraft, along with their clients. They reason that only a fellow witch would doubt the guilt of somebody accused of something as evil as witchcraft, by innocent children.

        Believe you me, I have sensed the hatred you have for me, because I take a different view from yours, of the strength of the available evidence that Ricky practised witchcraft with and upon his children, as he is accused of having done.

        I believe that the hatred shown towards me here, from somebody who quotes Ephesians 6:12, must grieve the Holy Spirit, as did many other things said and done in other witch hunts, earlier in history. That is why I would be honoured to correspond with you, about what may be learnt from the scriptures, about the right and wrong way to conduct witch hunts, and trials by public opinion for that matter, in which I appear as defence advocate for the accused, Ricky Dearman, because nobody else has stepped up to the plate.

        Ricky Dearman is as entitled to (as it were) legal representation in this so-called court of public opinion, as Ella was entitled to be legally represented at the fact-finding hearing held by Ms Pauffley, at which she chose not to be represented.

        Like

  12. I just want to comment that the case of the Hampstead children is neither unique, nor rare, and I have awoken from my “coma” to realise that the world is not only not as I thought it was, but it is NOTHING like I thought it was.

    For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the lords of this age, rulers of this darkness, against spiritual wickedness in the heavens. Ephesians 6:12

    Liked by 2 people

  13. “As a mother, and as a normal, decent human being, who has no interest in causing harm to others, I have deep concerns that there is an ongoing cover up over what has really gone on here, and I will not give up arguing these concerns until a fully transparent and clearly visible proper investigation has been completed.
    And until I, not John Allman, not Heather Martin, but I, am satisfied that these children’s interests have been served I will continue to follow this case and do whatever I can to help get to the truth.
    We don’t need to be wasting time on people whose interests are questionable. What we should be doing is working to co-ordinate our efforts in the pursuit of safety for these children.”
    (says sickened)

    J.Allman
    Can’t you READ?

    Like

    • Thanks Nike.

      My reference to Ephesians 6:12 was not borne out of concern for what is written in the Old Testament as Allman thinks, but rather to highlight that we are in battle with something dark, dangerous and intangible.

      I don’t know what that dark force is. It has always hidden itself away from the public eye, but is increasingly unable to do so. The functionaries of this force are scurrying in panic to hide their dirty deeds from the light of day, and the consequences they will face when enough decent people become aware of them and stand against them.

      It seems to me that we might very well be reaching a critical point in this fight, and every human being on this planet has a role to play in it. We are all responsible for what happens from here on in. We live in very interesting times, I think.

      Like

      • We can quite probably manage to navigate our way out of this unexpected theological dispute between us, without resorting to quoting from the Old Testament, unless, perversely, you desperately want to us to fail to settle our dispute. I have managed so far not to resort to quoting any Old Testament verses at you at all. Your allegation that I’d quoted the Old Testament was mistaken. Neither James nor Jude were Old Testament authors.

        Jewish people reading this blog might be disgruntled that you would like to place their scriptures out of bounds, mind you. But at least they won’t be able to accuse *me* of setting those discriminatory, anti-Semitic ground rules that you would like set, falsely accusing me of violating them before you had even decreed the said ground rules.

        Old Testament Judaism, and both testaments accepted by Christianity, alike disapprove of the witchcraft of which Ricky has been accused, even if the leading alleged witchcraft practitioner, Ricky, hadn’t embroiled his own son and his daughter in his weekly witchcraft, practised at Christchurch Primary School, Hampstead; in a secret room that the police, with a search warrant, didn’t notice; even if he hadn’t enjoyed the sheer fleshly, exquisite sexual pleasure a witchcraft cult-leader man can get (what a pervert!) out of watching a female head teacher inserting into a pupil child’s back passage, plastic willy that he had manufactured, in his own back garden shed.

        Both testaments also concur about how we ought to react, when we learn that our local contemporaries, such as Ricky, have become witchcraft suspects: suspects whom (in Ricky’s case) it took eleven whole days for the High Court’s Family Division, to find weren’t witches they were cracked up to be after all.

        Personally, I don;t need ANY books of the bible to make me aware that decapitating babies is a criminal offence, even in today’s benighted days – eight million human babies killed by the abortion industry since I was a schoolboy, 55 million in the USA in roughly the same time period.

        Such witchcraft as Ricky has been accused of, is unlawful in the UK, whether or not one cooks the babies’ flesh for dinner after decapitating them, drinks their blood, or dances as best one can whilst wearing heavy recklessness made of score or so of the deceased babies skulls. The freedom we have to manifest our religions in Europe doesn’t extend to manifesting Ricky’s alleged witchcraft religion, by murdering humans by decapitating them, regardless of whether Ricky and/or the other witchcraft disciples of his got around to eating anybody’s mortal remains, or any skull dancing, or insulted child-bottom plastic willy deployment..

        Like

      • @:Sickened

        “It seems to me that we might very well be reaching a critical point in this fight, and every human being on this planet has a role to play in it.”

        Thank God for this concession! I am a human being myself, I happen to live on Planet Earth too. May I too please continue to play my role, during the critical point of the “fight”, without further insults?

        Like

    • I have been open and honest with this community as to whose and what “interests” in this matter I hold dear, including my own interest in this case as a par excellence example of Parental Alienation at work, an evil better studied and documented in modern times than is the witchcraft alleged against Ricky and others. If you think that there is anything (as you put it) “questionable”, about my openly declared interests, or the slightest shred of evidence that I have an undeclared interest or two that is at all sinister (not just name-calling, please, actual *evidence*), then please feel free either to go ahead and “question” my declared interests, suggesting that these are not good interests of oneself, of truth campaigns one supports, oor of others, for me to have at heart; or to provide that evidence of undeclared, sinister interests you suspect me of having.

      I am happy to have my motives *questioned*. I am not happy for people simply to assert, with innuendo, that my interests are “questionable”, without actually questioning them substantively.

      Like

      • “… without actually questioning them substantively.”

        YOU and your ludicrous views have been challenged again and again.
        Where there is no real substance, there can’t be any challenge.
        Boredom – that’s all.

        Like

    • Sickened,
      And until I as a mother and abuse survivor am satisfied that the children’s interests are served in this case I will continue to follow and do whatever I can to help get to the truth. But ‘truth’ these days has an agenda and is intolerant of seeing any other side. What I can tell you is that truth is not sanctimonious, ego is, and the truth may be a grey area in there somewhere, but the children are not served if either side claims to have all the facts. I certainly do not and am simply here asking questions. I want to see Dearmans Non Mol verdict to DECIDE FOR MYSELF what I believe the truth is. I won’t for one second allow half-truths to pass for the whole, why would you? Would this not constitute a complete victory for your argument? Dearman absolutely found guilty of abusing his children??? This would be hard to ignore…so why be so defensive when this was raised as an objection. Methinks you protest too much.

      Like

      • Dearie Me
        What are you Allmans replacement?

        Look, I am not seeking “victory in argument” in this matter, I reserve that battle for trivia such as political debates and essays.

        I am however seeking to get as much information as I possibly can, so that I can ascertain for myself what the hell has been going on here. Someone has sexually abused, actually raped, those kids, and nobody is being investigated about it. It bloody stinks to high heaven.

        THE POINT HERE IS TO FIGHT FOR AN OPEN INVESTIGATION INTO THE CHILDREN’S CLAIMS BECAUSE, AS RAY SAVAGE CLEARLY STATES, AND AS I BELIEVE TO BE THE CASE, NO SUCH POLICE INVESTIGATION HAS TAKEN PLACE. INDEED, THE VERY FACT THAT DESPITE THE MEDICAL EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY AN EXPERIENCED PAEDIATRICIAN NO INVESTIGATION HAS TAKEN PLACE MUST RAISE A GREAT BIG RED FLAG TO ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN CELL!

        It is becoming increasingly obvious that there exists in our society a network, or networks, of highly organised paedophiles, in places of authority, from which they have managed to operate for decades with impunity. We are repeatedly seeing uncovered patterns of the same behaviour, and the same structure of operations amongst these elite paedophiles, Some of these child abusers even think that they are Satanists, which is pretty convenient because “do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”. Not so much a religion I think, as permission! It is not at all beyond the realms of possibility that SRA group has infested Hampstead institutions, we need a proper investigation in order to find out if that is the case.

        Regarding the issue of the non-molestation order , you said “……This would be hard to ignore…so why be so defensive when this was raised as an objection. Methinks you protest too much.”

        To be honest love, I think it is Allman who “doth protest too much”.

        Like

  14. Mr Allman,

    You wrote
    “Believe you me, I have sensed the hatred you have for me, because I take a different view from yours…”

    Mr. Allman, I do not hate you, I do not know you. What you are sensing from me is my perception of you as a pompous, arrogant, conceited, misogynistic pr**k, full of his own self-importance and sense of superiority over us lesser mortals. And that is the better of the 2 possibilities I perceive about you, because on the other hand you could just be a paedophile supporter and shill. I hope that you are the former, but sir, I do have my doubts.

    This is my last note to you Mr. Allman. You are a waste of my time.

    Like

  15. Oh my goodness, oh my goodness, please good people do not be “baited” by Mr. Allman. He knows not what he speaks of, nor has he thoroughly researched the totality of this case. Any one, who at this point and time can believe that those children were “coached” line after line, repeat after me, and “act” out every allegation as believable as possible (which FYI they carried off with Oscar nominated performances) are living their own misguided fantasy on the planet or perhaps, something even more sinister, or are a complete fidiot. Any one who has raised children for a lifetime, worked with children in any capacity, know that these children are telling the truth.

    This is far from a witch hunt, this is a simple, decent quest for truth! For justice to be done with a proper investigation, given the very serious, and sober allegations, which are very fitting and compliant with previous documented cases of SRA, is what we, the good people, demand.

    Okay, okay I guess I’ve been baited too, lol – but I’m giving you notice, Mr Allman – your reply is not welcomed either – good day, Sir.

    Like

    • @ truthquester

      “This is far from a witch hunt, this is a simple, decent quest for truth! For justice to be done with a proper investigation, given the very serious, and sober allegations, which are very fitting and compliant with previous documented cases of SRA, is what we, the good people, demand.”

      The abbreviation you have used, SRA, stands for Satanic Ritual Abuse.. Satanic Ritual Abuse is another name for witchcraft. So, what you’ve just written means:

      This is far from a witch hunt, this is a simple, decent quest for truth! [We want] justice to be done with a proper investigation, given the very serious, and sober allegations, which are very fitting and compliant with previous documented cases of WITCHCRAFT.

      Any “quest for truth” or “investigation” conducted because some children accused various people of witchcraft, is, by definition, a witch hunt.

      P and Q’s allegations are (you say) fitting and complaint with previous documented cases of SRA, which is another term for witchcraft. I agree. My observation is that the ensuing “investigation” and “quest for truth”, the hunt for perpetrators of SRA (i.e. witch hunt), is also compliant with previous documented examples of how witch hunts often fail to remain “simple”, “decent” and “proper” and “fitting” dispensations of “justice”, regardless of your wishes.

      Like

  16. Ftr..I lived through the Martensville case…everyone was do convinced that there was a satanic cult in my hometown that nobody cared that the social worker used leading questions of the children to turn a sexual abuse case into a Satanic sex abuse case. People got hysterical because everyone jumped to conclusions and no one compared the kids testimonies. It was a scandal that benefitted NO abused child in that case or any SRA case since.

    Like

    • Heather, I must apologise for the tone of my previous post to you. On reflection I think that I was unnecessarily sharp, for which I am sorry.

      All I am trying to say is that I smell a rat in this case. I believe that there has been a very thinly veiled cover up by the authorities, and I am concerned for the safety of those children.

      I am sorry to hear that you have suffered abuse. Fortunately that never happened to me, however, I had a close call with my daughter years ago, back in the dark ages when I was young and she was only a toddler.

      A creche opened up in the town where people could leave their children for a couple of hours whilst shopping, and a couple of times i considered using that facility. I was a busy working mum and I thought I might drop her off so that I could run round and pick up my groceries in half the time, pick her back up and go home. Well, fortunately, I never did drop her off there, because despite the fact that it was all official and registered with the local authorities and ‘approved’, it turned out to be a paedophile ring. The woman who ran the place lived not too far away from me, in a very nice area, and all I can tell you is that if I had used that creche for my daughter, I would have killed that woman. Absolutely not the right thing to do of course, but, probably a normal reaction.

      I agree with what you said about keeping the focus on doing something about the sickness in our society. Let’s hope we can get all these paedophiles, from the highest to the lowest, imprisoned and out of society so that they will not have the opportunity to harm children ever again.

      .

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thank you for the change in tone and your apology…your kindness is appreciated.

        Nothing worse than finding out you nearly made a horrible mistake (I’ve had a few of these myself and it causes plenty of lost sleep and tears). If anything were to have happened to my own children…and now grandchildren I truly cannot vouch for my sanity and say I wouldn’t try to aquire a firearm to ‘rehabilitate’ the abuser with a couple of leads. That’s a horrible thing to say and to admit to myself let alone anyone else, and so it is that I have a great compassion for people following this case. If one in three children are victims of sexual abuse then we can see how so many people are emotionally invested. Bump that up to 100% when you consider the number of people affected in a family where abuse has happened. So we have a potential of every single person following this case as having been affected in some way or another by sexual abuse.

        Now, just because my (and Allman’s) perspective comes from a place of cynacism, I can assure you it is BECAUSE we have concerns that ANY lies being passed off as truths are an impediment to obtaining justice. I have had this experience in researching Kevin Annett, who many people believed without question when he claimed he had found human remains at a Residential School in Ontario Canada. With myself and a few others doing our due diligence and questioning him, he eventually admitted that they were animal bones they had found. But what happened in that short time since he began waving those animal bones around at Occupy rallies and in ‘press-releases’ was EXACTLY what has happened with this case. At that time Belinda was a big supporter of Kevin’s, and financed several trips a year to be a Christine Sands of sorts. People labelled me a shill for exposing his numerous lies…but I could take it because I knew the truth and had spoken to people he had hurt. I smelled a rat with Annett and I smell a rat with this case too….but as you rightly pointed out the truth WILL come out and we will find out if we landed on the right side of the fence or not. Till then, I will continue to ask questions of all the parties involved until we get to a better understanding of what happened. Thanks for listening.

        Like

    • amnesty for paedophiles?
      No, definitely not.
      That wouldn’t be the right signal…
      Belinda McKenzie must be very naive.
      Being too naive is nothing but a trap…

      Like

  17. Thanks Heather. There is nothing wrong with being cynical. I always (half) joke that the opposite of being cynical is being gullible. It is right to question everything, always, and without fail. I find that working out “who benefits” is usually key to any analysis of a given issue.

    This case is not black and white and there are some questionable issues on both sides, which is why there must be a public and open inquiry and investigation, so that justice (wherever that may lie) can be done, and, most importantly, can be seen to be done.

    If I had encountered this case 20 years ago, I would have immediately thought that Draper was a weirdo, because, at that time, the public was completely unaware of institutionalised paedophilia. For most people, at that time, the concept of our respectable elite practicing Satanic Rituals and witchcraft, was so totally off the wall and such claims could never be taken seriously.

    But today, as evidence is rapidly building that, in fact, we do have people in positions of authority who are involved with Satanism, I can no longer brush this all off as bullsh1t. The sexual abuse of children, whether part of Satanic ritual or not, is clearly embedded deeply in all the institutions that we once respected, and the people we thought were good, such as priests, clergymen, teachers, social workers etc were actually the opposite of what they purported to be. Everything is inverted.

    So far, I think that there is more than a slight chance that SRA has gone on here, as the children first stated in their interviews. The retraction cannot be accepted as valid without a thorough investigation being undertaken, if only to be certain that the children were not threatened into making those retractions.

    Given that we know that there is a strong interelationship between paedophiles in different areas of ‘authority’, who all work together to cover up each others dirty deeds, it is critical that every minute detail expressed by the children is gone through with a fine tooth comb, before anyone can legitimately state that this never happened.

    Keep digging, keep it public, and the truth will out.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s