DEAR #MP #ChildSexualAbuse #CSA is an #Election Issue!

Please note this voting record of MPs regarding the Official Secrets Act.

This email went to all MPs without referring to it.

Dear MP,

This is to ask whether you are willing to stand up for children and against their organised and orchestrated abuse, as covered-up historically and currently by supporting victims of institutionalised child snatching, forced adoptions and sexual exploitation.

The current case is about the 8-year-old boy and 9-year-old girl who have become ‘internet famous’ as the whistleblower kids. For they told their mother, partner and the Police – in a completely consistent manner over a few weeks – about the rape and torture they had experienced and witnessed, together with some 20 other children, besides crimes pertaining to a secret cult with about 70 members – in eight schools in the Hampstead Highgate area of London.

On behalf of the children and their Russian mother and grandparents, the challenge is to appeal the judgement of Mrs Justice Pauffley that she announced to the press as ‘Satanic cult claims dismissed’. Her critics talk about professional misconduct, abuse of judicial position and that she misrepresented facts presented in the case, was negligent in her role and derelict in her duties.

I am writing as the McKenzie Friend (lay legal advisor) who has assisted the mother since November 2014, until we both fled the jurisdiction for fear of arrest and imprisonment. After all, Harriet Harman MP said already in 2006 that 200 parents a year as imprisoned by secret family courts.

Cover-ups have been incurred by Barnet Police, the Met, Barnet Court and internet corporations, besides the High Court, where Mrs Justice Pauffley led proceedings in secret, while a Police investigation is supposedly still being handled by Operation Hydrant, according to the Home Office.

The British and international public on the internet have expressed their outrage beyond anybody’s control or overview. But public Witness Statements are being collated for an appeal under the auspices of a legal team, together with reports to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office. See http://www.meetup.com/whistleblowerkids/about/

Furthermore, I submitted this emergency petition

It follows on from Petition 1707/2013 to the Petitions Committee of the EU Parliament to

For the secrecy of UK family courts has legitimised the snatching of children at an industrial scale, i.e. 1,000 a month or every 20 minutes as Channel IV publishes on their film “15,000 Kids and counting”.

The evidence is overwhelming: as John Hemming MP has said repeatedly: Social Services, Cafcass and secret family courts take children when they should not be taken from their families and don’t get involved when they should.

Just as the election is a time for the electorate to make their decisions, so will this election become a time for you to decide which side are you on:

  • the support of future generations
  • or its destruction via a system of institutions whose performance is anything but up to professional standards or ethics.

For further information please follow links such as:

  1. UK Infringement of EU Directive on Child Sexual Abuse and sexual exploitation of children & child pornography
    1. http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/2015/03/02/uk_infringement-of-eu_directive-on-childsexualabuse-csa-and-sexual-exploitation-of-children-child-pornography/
  2. The latest petition to the EU Petitions Committee:
    1. Using the Secrecy of UK Family Courts to Cover-Up Criminal Activities
  3. Our submissionthatwas presented on 19 March 2014ascan be seen in this video
    1. Systemic Patterns of Child Snatching and Forced Adoptions in the UK
  4. Dossier of online Evidence to support the petition to abolish ‘forced adoptions’
    1. 12 pages of links as online evidence together with over 8,000 signatures on a number of online petitions.

With best wishes for your election campaigning,

Sabine K McNeill

Mother’s McKenzie Friend, Whistleblower Kids in the Court of Public Interest > 60,000 visits since 21 February 2015
.. from Child Snatching and the Secrecy of Family Courts to Forced Adoptions, Child Sexual Exploitation and Satanic Ritual Abuse

Web publisher, Association of McKenzie Friends  > 50,000 signatures since February 2012
… assisting the Hampstead Scandal in court and online

www.SabineMcNeill.co.uk
… mathematician, system analyst, event organiser and web publisher

Advertisements

169 thoughts on “DEAR #MP #ChildSexualAbuse #CSA is an #Election Issue!

  1. I would like to know for what reason this russian mother would coach her children towards the making up of this abominable story? Could you reply me to this mr J Alliman?

    Liked by 1 person

    • @ Torquemada

      “I would like to know for what reason this russian mother would coach her children towards the making up of this abominable story? Could you reply me to this mr J Alliman?”

      You have asked a very sensible question. I am delighted. Thank you.

      From the judgment:

      24. The parents of P and Q met in 2003. Their relationship had disintegrated by 2006 when the father went to live in an adjacent street. There were occasional referrals to the police when domestic violence was alleged. Ms Draper initiated private law proceedings in 2008.

      25. Over the course of the next six years, there was never a time when the children’s contact with their father proceeded smoothly. Countless returns to court achieved very little. If there was an attempt to achieve judicial continuity it failed miserably. Between November 2010 and August 2014 when the case was pending at First Avenue House, High Holborn it drifted between no fewer than seven different judges. None of the nine hearings resulted in a considered judgment on the basis of oral evidence. The essential cause of the problems was never the subject of judicial determination.

      26. A non molestation injunction order was made against the father in 2010. There was some involvement on the part of the London Borough of Camden; in December 2008 a core assessment was prepared. Between May 2010 and October 2013, therapeutic sessions occurred intermittently at the Tavistock Clinic. There was a period, notably between November 2011 and November 2012, when the children did not have contact with their father.

      27. There was intermittent concern about P’s relationship with her mother and also that both children were presenting as and complaining of being hungry at school.

      28. In May 2014, after a period of renewed involvement by the London Borough of Camden, Mr Dearman had contact with the children for the first time since October 2013. In that same month, the mother met Abraham Christie.

      29. On 4 June 2014, there was a scene in the playground at Christchurch School when Mr Christie was collecting P and Q at the end of the school day. He was loud and aggressive, accusing the teachers of poisoning the children by giving them the food supplied at the school. By the middle of June, according to Ms Draper, Mr Christie was staying over at her home on two or three nights each week.

      To this, I will add that I have observed the ABE interviews, and noted that the children themselves reported a long history of attempts on the part of Ella to disrupt their contact with Ricky, for trivial reasons, typical of a pattern of behaviour that is usually referred to as “parental alienation”. Parental alienation occurs when one (controlling) parent seeks to exclude the other parent from the lives of the children they had together. It is characterised by indoctrinating the children against the parent from whom the alienating parent is attempting to alienate them from, including the coaching of the children to make false allegations against the alienated parent.

      My take on this whole case is documented at
      https://johnallmanuk.wordpress.com/2015/03/21/extreme-parental-alienation/

      which reposts this simply superb piece by Parental Alienation expert Karen Woodall, of The Family Separation Clinic, which explains far better than I can “When children lie and why they lie and why people who work with separated families should know that they lie and why”:
      https://karenwoodall.wordpress.com/2015/03/21/when-children-lie-and-why-they-lie-and-why-people-who-work-with-separated-families-should-know-that-they-lie-and-why/

      You have only to look at the family history. For six years, Ella had regarded the raising of the children with Ricky, despite their separation, not as a co-operation, but as a competition, There are millions of children in the UK deprived of one of their two parents, by a controlling and insecure parent like that, who want to be the children’s ONLY parent. (Karen explains why this happens so often.) She was succeeding, but then social services intervened, reinstating the excluded father. At about this time, as Ella was desperately seeking a way of excluding Ricky from P and Q’s lives again that not even social services would be able to stop her inflicting upon P and Q, Ella met Abe. And the rest, as they say, is history.

      You have asked the necessary question that somebody more open-minded than the typical participant is this discussion would ask. I have pointed you to a vast library of resources at Karen’s websites for you to learn as much as you need to know, as to why and how controlling, insecure parents, each hostile to the other parent of his or her children, regularly coach their children, easily, into making false allegations, sometimes without being fully aware that that is what they are doing. I hope you take the trouble to learn from those resources.

      Those of us activists who are tackling the problem of Parental Alienation along with the corruption of the family courts, and activists concerned about the practices of witchcraft, see through different eyes.

      To us, the accusation against Ricky of witchcraft, and the ensuing witch-hunt, was easily recognised as the desperate measure of last resort of a megalomaniac of a parent, whose empire was crumbling before her very eyes. It reminded me of Hitler, who once controlled most of western mainland Europe, cowering in his bunker, ordering the flooding of the Berlin underground railway stations where millions of German civilians were sheltering, just to delay for a few more days the final disappearance of his empire. (Happily, his staff disobeyed that order, and the refugees were not all drowned.) Ella, once with all the power, and on a mission to deprive P and Q of their dad for the past six years, was fighting like a cornered rat, to regain the dominion she had once gained over P and Q and Ricky, but recently lost, being forced to *share* children whom she though of as “her” children, as though their father was no more significant in their lives as an anonymous sperm donor, with their natural father.

      This missed golden opportunity of those who rightly wish to eradicate witchcraft such as Ricky was accused of from the face of the earth, to have a witch hunt that found some real witches and saw them banged to rights, produced in the anti-witchcraft activists a sense of profound anti-climax, with which they find it hard to cope. But an hour spent learning about parental alienation, as I have enabled you to enjoy, will enable you to understand why anti-parental alienation activists like Karen and myself, find something to rejoice in, in the failure of the Hampstead witch hunt to find any witches.

      Like

      • Sabine, I gladly salute you as the tireless crusader you are, against the UK’s wicked, unduly secretive and often downright corrupt family courts: A crusader with the stamina to fight far more cases of family injustice than I have managed to fight, within our almost *useless* British family courts. I have admired you from afar for a long time. I felt highly honoured, illegally to be granted access (by a person whom I hope I shall never need to grass up) to the ABE videos, in January 2015.

        Although you haven’t so far uttered a single syllable addressed to me since Ms Pauffley’s judgment, I am grateful to learn that you at least “liked” my long comment addressed to Torquemada, which referenced psychologist Karen Woodall’s mightily scholarly life’s work, to combat Parental Alienation, which she perceives to be enabled by naive gender feminism on the part of many social work professionals.

        Best wishes.

        Like

      • @Torquemada, April 7, 2015 at 3:49 pm
        I would like to know for what reason this russian mother would coach her children towards the making up of this abominable story? Could you reply me to this mr J Alliman?

        There’s no reasonable motive for Ella to “coach” her children towards the making up of these horrendous allegations. She’s answered to that question very clearly herself. It’s not about “parental alienation” (that’s Mr Allman’s obsession) but about Mr Dearman’s violent and abusive behaviour… emotionally, psychologically and even sexually. It’s about Ella desperately tying to protect her children from an abusive father.

        Like

        • Can you spot the assumptions in your analysis of what this case is “about”?

          Do you understand what is meant by the common phrase “entitled to the presumption of innocence”? Where does that appear in your analysis?

          Like

  2. What a deluded mess John Allman has written above. Alas, he can not see the wood for the trees!
    He has lost the plot in the wordiness of it all
    he has missed the ‘elephant’ in the room – in fact, standing on his foot!
    he has refused to join up the dots or look at the rotten foundations and NON-judgment that has been repeatedly relied upon by him
    he has ignored that the TRUE WITNESSES have been intimidated – an imprisonable criminal offence!
    he has ignored the fact that the mother has been terrorised along with Sabine, into seeking exile for their own SAFETY
    he has condoned the atrocities of the dumbed-down controlled “Media” who will only ‘report’ the lies they are force-fed by their paymasters
    he has ignored the testimony of the children themselves, who have no agenda and agreed in the first police interviews to tell the truth – until they were manipulated and mis-treated and unduly influenced by the rotten irresponsible police who left them for unacceptably lengthy periods of time (a form of perceived punishment to a child, hence they want to cooperate in order to be allowed to live in peace and leave the ‘interviews’)

    and the fact these children described birthmarks and other intimate details which they could never have possibly known about, had they now witnessed them

    then he mocks the whole thing by ridicule, referring to “finding no witches” – very funny, not.

    John Allman must be yet another propaganda merchant and paid assassin of truth? yep, seems so.

    Like

    • he has also ignored the inescapable fact that the REAL witnesses have never been heard!
      And that Ricky D should have been arrested and put on remand for breaching the NMO
      And the Judge laid off because of conflicting evidence, abuse of power and position, the absence of any Jury or due process of Law, and she should have been questioned by the United Nations and all others who are violating the UCC codes

      Like

    • “then he mocks the whole thing by ridicule, referring to ‘finding no witches’ ”

      It is not to mock or to ridicule the protests of the truth campaigners, who are demanding a resumption of the hunt for the witches and for the resumed hunt for witches to be conducted better in future than they think the hunt for witches has been conducted hitherto, for me to make this observation: that the main complaint of the campaigners does indeed seem to be precisely the complaint I said it was. Their complaint is that judge Pauffley did not find any witches, and (they believe) would have found some witches, if only she had done her job properly.

      The known facts are, plainly and briefly, as follows, expressed in neutral language. If there is any mockery or ridicule perceived, it isn’t added by me, but rather arises because the plain facts must seem themselves to be a ridiculous mockery, to whoever thinks he or she detects mockery or ridicule in my neutral-language statement of the plain facts. (I don’t agree that there is mockery or ridicule my statement of the plain facts. I’m just saying that if anybody thinks there is, they should recognise that I didn’t put it there.)

      The plain facts:

      1) Two children made accusations of witchcraft.
      2) These accusations of witchcraft placed a duty upon the authorities to try to determine who definitely was, and who might not be and probably wasn’t, a witch, amongst those accused. In short, the accusations of witchcraft made necessary an official hunt for witches and for witchcraft.
      3) There was therefore a police investigation, of sorts.
      4) Some have criticised the police investigation as inadequate.
      5) There was an eleven day court hearing.
      6) Some have criticised the court hearing as inadequate.
      7) Judge Pauffley announced after the court hearing, in writing, to the general public, that she had not been able to find any witches.
      8) Judge Pauffley added that there probably hadn’t been any witchcraft going on in the lives of the children who had made the accusations of witchcraft. She found that the children’s accusations of witchcraft had probably been false.
      9) Some people are disappointed that judge Pauffley didn’t find any witches. They disagree with her findings that there had been no witches and no witchcraft, and that the children’s accusations of witchcraft had been false. They demand a sequel to judge Pauffley’s Hampstead witch hunt, with a happier ending.

      In short, the official witch hunt concluded by judge Pauffley found no witches. Those who believe that the children had made true accusations of witchcraft were disappointed. Those who were disappointed, remain worried for the safety of the children, if decisions about their future are informed by the findings of the official witch hunt that they consider to have been inadequate, findings which they consider to have been wrong.

      Like

  3. PS: children do not lie in situations of this nature. They know it is not a joke. they are not sniggering to the camera or anything like that. they have spoken the truth without agenda or ulterior motive as they have no frame of reference of this being murder / cannibalism etc which it is
    they have had their innocent minds conditioned and filled with sordid experiences like a frog that is put into cold water and slowly brought to the boil (whereas a frog dropped in boiling water will leap out, these poor children have been slowly mind-controlled into acquiescence and relative acceptance of the sordid goings-on).
    It is highly dubious that Pauffley has any relevant qualifications in child psychology
    this is a highly specialised area
    the children lucidly said the mother had never harmed them
    they lucidly said that ‘papa is the leader of the cult.. he’s the boss’
    they clearly told the truth
    they graphically described the 3 colours of plastic penises (consistent with hierarchal freemason rituals) etc
    they described being injected in the neck to ‘calm them’ – so they were intimidated into ‘cooperating’ with thee abuse rather than risk death or unknown injections (how absolutely horrible)
    they have been bullied into drinking baby’s blood and cutting off babies heads which they confirmed were dead – unreal? all documented reports confirm these are common practices in satanic rituals
    and then forced to eat the baby’s cooked flesh – when they are vegans – horrific and worse that the worst horror story on the planet
    they obviously complied because they were terrified of the consequences if they resisted the tyrannical demands made of them

    these poor children have been subjected to the most appalling abuse imaginable to any living being
    they were ENTRAPPED in an unconscionable situation of filth and serious criminal behaviour of adults and threatened if they spoke out – held hostage to ruthless depraved sickos whose next move they lived in fear of
    Ridiculous to put a child through these things! Ridiculous to ignore their needs
    Ridiculous to ignore doing a full-scale enquiry in to the other children and finding out what they have to say?
    Easy enough to corroborate and ‘prove’ with following through on the oral testimonies made – in the Public Interest

    But the trouble is, there are too many Public officials who are in too deep and want to escape Justice and life imprisonment (the penalty due to them under the Police Handbook guidelines) so they club together and cook up distraction techniques in any way possible.

    Clearly, those ignoring all of the above, are scared to face hard facts, and have no clue about child protection and children’s and parental rights….nor any suitability in terms of understanding how powerful the issue of motivation can be – the children’s main motivation became to eschew an more tiresome and tedious police interviews! so they gave them what they wanted (phoney recanting of evidence after coaching and psychological punishments)

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve had enough your wasting the space on my blog now, John.

    I’ve blocked you.

    All commentators who may disagree, please note:

    1. it’s always easier to be negative than to be positive and constructive. I’m after CONSTRUCTIVE and potentially collaborative action. That’s why I set up http://www.meetup.com/whistleblowerkids as a platform that is designed for that purpose.

    2. I thought that John was ‘ok’ because of his blog http://www.killed.org.uk but I feel he’s wasting our time as well as mental and emotional energies.

    3. I am partly responding to the suggestion of an ACTIVE supporter.

    It is really, really hard for me to live what I’m going through. I do NOT need to even have to read your negative posts.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Well said Sabine. And well done for taking appropriate definitive action. There are none so blind as those who will NOT see – they become energy vampires and waste precious focus, better spent elsewhere.

      Do we know how long R.Dearman has been breaching the NMO from 2010? Why hasn’t he been arrested for violating it? Unlike Vicky Haigh’s bogus “NMO” drawn up by a NON-solicitor aka malicious social worker, for which she was incarcerated for allegedly ‘breaching’ it, it appears the 2010 NMO against R.Dearman was a genuine one?

      It’s clear that satanic ritual abuse IS a form of witchcraft that is involved, so why the red herring about “looking for witches and not finding any?” Surely, those females who participated in the rituals were “witches” – which included the children naming the Head Teacher at Christchurch school, and many other staff and social workers – so wouldn’t this make them the “witches” by rights of logic and reason? See these links:

      “Ritual Abuse and Mind Control—Kathleen Sullivan
      whale.to/b/sullivan.htmlCached
      Magic Surgery. Child victims of ritual abuse describe being drugged or hypnotized and, … “Breaking the Circle of Satanic Ritual Abuse” by Daniel Ryder …

      Abusive Witchcraft “Sacred Ground” « End Ritual Abuse
      endritualabuse.org/about/abusive-witchcraft-sacred-groundCached

      I am referring to “Witchcraft Ritual Abuse”, not Wicca. Witchcraft ritual abuse and Satanic ritual abuse both include human sacrifice and sexual torture of children.
      Witchcraft and Satanic Abuse – Video Results

      Is witchcraft satanic? | Yahoo Answers
      answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=…Cached

      Abusive Witchcraft “Sacred Ground” – Tripod.com
      truthbeknown2000.tripod.com/Truthbeknown2000/id26.htmlCached
      Witchcraft ritual abuse and Satanic ritual abuse both include human sacrifice and sexual torture of children. However, Satanism and Witchcraft attach …(truncated)

      John Allman states: (SEE MY COMMENTS IN CAPS)

      “The plain facts: (AHEM! THESE ARE ALL TOTALLY FLAWED)

      1) Two children made accusations of witchcraft.

      SEE ABOVE – a simple internet search proves that satanic abuse involves witchcraft

      2) These accusations of witchcraft placed a duty upon the authorities to try to determine who definitely was, and who might not be and probably wasn’t, a witch, amongst those accused. In short, the accusations of witchcraft made necessary an official hunt for witches and for witchcraft.

      THAT IS JUST PLAIN STUPIDITY AND AN OBVIOUS DISTRACTION TECHNIQUE, TO DIVERT WHAT IS RIGHT UNDER THEIR NOSES! IT SOUNDS LIKE THESE NUMPTIES ARE LOOKING FOR ARCHETYPAL LONG-HAIRED CREATURES WITH POINTED CHINS AND POINTED HATS!

      3) There was therefore a police investigation, of sorts.

      WITHOUT IMPARTIALITY AND INDEPENDENCE, THE VESTED-INTEREST CORPORATION OF THE ‘POLICE’ IS UNABLE TO CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION BECAUSE THEY ARE PARTISAN AND THIS WAS CONFIRMED IN JANUARY 2014 IN THE LEAKED NEW SCOTLAND YARD REPORTS OF FREEMASONS INFILTRATING IN “CRIMINAL GANGS’ THE POLICE FORCE AND HMCTS – OPERATION TIBERIUS, OPERATION ZLOTY, OPERATION OTHONA, DEMONSTRATES THE POLICE ARE CONFLICTED AND THEREFORE UNABLE TO BE INVOLVED!
      IT IS TOO IRONIC FOR WORDS. FOOLISH “JUDGE”, FOOLISH OFFICIALS – DELIBERATELY NOT SEEING WHAT IS IN FRONT OF THEM. AND SO PERPETUATING THE LIES – BECOMING A WILLING ACCESSORY.

      4) Some have criticised the police investigation as inadequate.

      HA! THAT’S THE UNDERSTATEMENT – IT IS INVALID AS THEY HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS AND ARE COVERING THEIR OWN BACKS – THEY ARE CO-DEFENDANTS IN THE RITUAL ABUSE. SO ARE INCAPABLE OF ACTING IMPARTIALLY, WHICH IS ESSENTIAL.

      5) There was an eleven day court hearing.

      NO THERE WAS NO COURT “HEARING”. BECAUSE THERE WAS NO DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AND IT IS DISALLOWED TO CONDUCT SUCH THINGS IN SECRET, AS THEY WELL KNOW. TO BE CALLED A ‘HEARING’ IT NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED IMPARTIALLY, PUBLICLY, CLEAN-HANDEDLY, FREE OF INTIMIDATION OF CRUCIAL WITNESSES, AND ABOVE ALL, FAIR. NONE OF THESE CRITERIA WERE APPLIED. SO NO HEARING HAS TAKEN PLACE, AND NO FINDING OF FACT EITHER.
      IT WAS MERELY A FUTILE, VALUELESS ‘SESSION’ USED AS A BACK-COVERING EXERCISE BY THOSE WHOV’E IMPLICATED THEMSELVES.

      6) Some have criticised the court hearing as inadequate.

      SEE ABOVE – NO COURT HEARING OR FACT FIND HAS EVER TAKEN PLACE. NO PROVISION WAS MADE AND NO BASIS EITHER. IT WAS MORE LIKE A FISHING EXPEDITION TO SEE HOW MUCH EVERYONE KNEW & TRYING TO SYNCRHCONISE THEIR STORIES TO COVER IT ALL UP, HENCE THEY KEPT THEIR WICKED ACTS COVERED, IN FEAR OF BEING REPROVED.

      7) Judge Pauffley announced after the court hearing, in writing, to the general public, that she had not been able to find any witches.

      SHE SHOULD BE ARRESTED AND REMOVED AS A JUDGE ON THE SPOT, JUST AS A START. SEE ABOVE. SHE IS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND IS ALLOWING A FLAGRANT ABUSE OF COURT PROCESS TO CONCEAL AND ATTEMPT TO LEGITIMISE CRIMINAL ACTS SO SORDID IN NATURE THAT SHE HAS LENT HERSELF AS A WILLING ACCESSORY TO SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME THROUGH HER COMPLETE LACK OF JUDICIOUSNESS.

      8) Judge Pauffley added that there probably hadn’t been any witchcraft going on in the lives of the children who had made the accusations of witchcraft.

      SHE HAS NO RIGHT TO SAY THIS, BECAUSE OF HER OWN NON-COMPLIANCE WITH COMMON LAW AND COMMON SENSE. SHE HAS ABUSED THE COURT PROCESS TO DISMISS SOMETHING EXTREMELY SERIOUS. SHE IS ALSO NOT ALLOWED IN CRIMINAL LAW TO DISMISS ANYTHING ON THE GROUNDS OF JUST “PROBABILITY” AS IT HAS TO MEET THE STANDARD OF “BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT” – WHICH THIS IS NOT!

      IT IS ALSO SELF-EVIDENT THAT MADAM PAUFFLEY HAS ENGAGED IN A WHOLESALE FAILURE TO DO ANY RESEARCH INTO THE CLOSE CORRELATION BETWEEN WITCHCRAFT / MIND CONTROL AND SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE (WITCHCRAFT INVOLVES RITUALS, FOR INSTANCE) AND SHE CALLED IN NO EXPERT DID SHE? SO SHE HAD NO FRAME OF REFERENCE AND HAS BEEN PROVABLY RECKLESS, IN THE EXTREME.

      She found that the children’s accusations of witchcraft had probably been false.

      SHE HAD NO BASIS TO ‘FIND’ ANYTHING – SEE ABOVE – BECAUSE OF HER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW AND THE CHILDREN’S COMMON LAW RIGHTS. ONCE AGAIN – NO ROOM FOR MERE ‘PROBABILITY’….SHE HAD A DUTY TO CALL IN THE OTHER NAMED CHILDREN BEING ABUSED AND TO GATHER EVIDENCE ON WHAT THEY WERE SAYING – E.G. VERIFYING THE BIRTHMARKS THEY REFERRED TO ON VARIOUS SOCIAL WORKERS AND SCHOOL STAFF, AND CALLING FOR SWORN AFFIDAVITS WITH THE PENALTY OF PERJURY IF THEY VIOLATE THE TRUTH – NONE OF THIS WAS DONE! THERE WAS EVIDENTLY NO STRUCTURE TO MADAM PAUFFLEY’S “FACT FIND” WHICH WAS NOTHING MORE, IT SEEMS, THAN A TIME-WASTING EXERCISE.

      9) Some people are disappointed that judge Pauffley didn’t find any witches.

      ‘GROW UP’ IS THE MOST APPROPRIATE RESPONSE HERE… MODERN DAY WITCHCRAFT IS NOT DEFINED AS A FAIRTY TALE CHARACTERISATION OF A ‘WITCH’

      THE FREE DICTIONARY GIVES ONE SUCH DEFINITION BY WAY OF EXAMPLE:

      witch (wɪtʃ)
      n
      1. (Alternative Belief Systems) a person, usually female, who practises or professes to practise magic or sorcery, esp black magic, or is believed to have dealings with the devil
      2. an ugly or wicked old woman
      3. (Alternative Belief Systems) a Wiccan priest or priestess
      4. a fascinating or enchanting woman
      5. (Alternative Belief Systems) short for water witch
      vb
      6. (Alternative Belief Systems) (tr) to cause or change by or as if by witchcraft
      7. a less common word for bewitch
      [Old English wicca; related to Middle Low German wicken to conjure, Swedish vicka to move to and fro]

      They disagree with her findings that there had been no witches and no witchcraft, and that the children’s accusations of witchcraft had been false.

      SEE ABOVE. NO RIGHT TO SAY THIS WITHOUT EXAMINING THE CORROBORATING EVIDENCE THE CHILDREN REFERRED TO – WHICH NEEDS A FULL FORENSIC ENQUIRY!

      They demand a sequel to judge Pauffley’s Hampstead witch hunt, with a happier ending.
      COMPLETE NONSENSE. THIS MAKES A MOCKERY OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF WHAT HAS OCCURRED TO THE VULNERABLE CHILDREN! AND IS AN ABUSE OF POWER AND POSITION. THE ALLEGED ‘JUDGE’ WAS NO EXPERT IN SUCH THINGS AND HAD NO BASIS TO MAKE ANY ‘FINDING’ UNLESS IT WENT THROUGH A FAIR TRIAL AND DUE PROCESS ETC ETC AND WAS FOUND AND PROVEN TO BE ‘BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT’. HAS EVERYONE FORGOTTEN THAT CRIMINAL MATTERS MAY NOT BE HEARD IN A CIVIL COURT?
      THIS IS A CROWN COURT JURY MATTER AND PUBLIC TRIAL MATERIAL.

      In short, the official witch hunt concluded by judge Pauffley found no witches.

      MORE MINDLESS DRIVEL. NO DEFINITIONS PROVIDED EITHER! THERE IS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF WITHCRAFT AND DEALINGS WITH THE DEVIL. AND ‘JUDGE’ PAUFFLEY WAS CLEARLY UNFIT AND UNQUALIFIED TO CONDUCT SUCH A COURT SESSION….

      Those who believe that the children had made true accusations of witchcraft were disappointed.

      THE CHILDREN ARE TELLING THE TRUTH
      THEY ARE FREE OF ANY AGENDA, THE “JUDGE” AND THOSE ACCUSED, ARE NOT!
      THE CHILDREN GAVE THE SIMPLE FACTS AND THE TRUTH, THE JUDGE CONTORTED THE FACTS AND TWISTED THE TRUTH TO DISARM IT AND TO TRY TO (WICKEDLY) NEUTRALISE WHAT WAS BEING SAID – SO THAT NO LIABILTY WOULD BE FOUND AGAINST THE ROTHSCHILD-CONTROLLED STATE WORKERS AND THOSE IMPLICATED WITH GROSS MISFEASANCE AND SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AND MULTIPLE INDICTABLE OFFENCES IN PUBLIC OFFICE…
      NONE OF THEM WANT TO GO TO JAIL SO WILL PASS THE BUCK ON TO THE TERRORISED ABSENT MOTHER AND THE RESPONSIBLE PARTNER OF THE MOTHER WHO HAD THE DECENCY AND INTEGRITY TO CONTACT THE POLICE!

      Those who were disappointed, remain worried for the safety of the children, if decisions about their future are informed by the findings of the official witch hunt that they consider to have been inadequate, findings which they consider to have been wrong.

      ALL A MOOT POINT, AND OTIOSE. SEE ABOVE.

      Liked by 1 person

      • It is very suspicious circumstances – after all, it was Neela who was assaulted by the church warden, whilst the police on the beat just stood by and watched him assault neela, who was peaceable and not making inflammatory comments, merely reading out the mother’s statement.
        VERY unnatural behaviour from the police and church warden!

        Then it is suspicious how Christine Sands sounded almost hysterical and fanatical in the way she came across, raising her voice unnecessarily and making wild comments with unruly behaviour which gives the wrong impression completely – how come she popped out of the woodwork, calling herself ‘sherif’, when she is not even from the UK and has no jurisdiction here??

        Like

    • The Hampstead Research thread also called “Why has an activist been arrested?”
      is different to the lost one from this site, quite a lot actually.

      Like

  5. Allman must be a lynch pin in the whole (apparently staged?) set up?
    His reactions were all totally unnatural. He tried to weakly justify ‘witch hunts’ and ignored the glaring red flags….latching on to half-baked things but never following through with anything logical, failing to join up the dots, and ignoring the children’s welfare totally – how abnormal is that?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s