The Hampstead Judgement Contains Basic Factual Errors.

And now another critique of the judgment. Witness E for our collection on http://www.meetup.com/whistleblowerkids/about/

Crimes of Empire

Witness and Victim G. Witness and Victim G.

March 31st, 2015.

The Hampstead Judgement Contains Proven Falsehoods and Cannot Therefore be Valid.
As seasoned cover up merchants have long known, the best way to conduct a cover up is to get on the front foot, seize the initiative and present an essentially inverted narrative, where the perpetrators are the victims and the victims are perpetrators. As the Americans might put it, the best form of defense is offense.  And so it was that Justice Pauffley announced grandly and unequivocally on the first page of her Judgement that:

“I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish “ Justice Pauffley, Hampstead…

View original post 2,746 more words

Advertisements

21 thoughts on “The Hampstead Judgement Contains Basic Factual Errors.

  1. Sabine,

    I have just shared the latest (crimesofempire) blog articles on Reddit, in an attempt to get this disgusting situation some mainstream attention. Anyone interested in helping this happen should create a reddit account (30 seconds) and vote for the article. It will then climb up the “reddit chart” depending on how many likes it gets. Reddit has millions of readers. Its headline is “High Court judge ignores masses of evidence of paedophile ring In Hampstead, London. Hands children back to abusers as part of cover-up”

    PS Sabine, thank you on behalf of all of us for being a good, honest focal point for defending innocence.

    Alan

    Liked by 1 person

  2. How can anyone trust a video made by a man who subjected two young children to violence – including hitting them with spoons and ‘water torture’ – in order to, supposedly, force them to tell the truth? No wonder G doesn’t want to see him again.

    Of course it was good of Sabine to advocate for the mother in court. However, she was not there to know what actually happened and nor was I.

    I hope that the children are less muddled up now. I understand that the mother was happy to ‘blow the whistle out of fear’ for the other children. They would all three have been better helped by consulting a therapist or trauma expert who would definitely go to prison if they tortured their clients into making videos and then posted them to the internet !

    As a lay helper, Sabine’s position is of course, different. I see that she is is/was just pushing for an investigation and my reading tells me not that people are necessarily covering things up but that the actions of the boyfriend have both undermined and prejudiced the ‘case’.

    Regards, Katy

    Like

    • I am amazed at your conclusions. Have you seen all the evidence available? Hitting one of them with a spoon might not be appropriate but the issue here is that they have undeniably been sexually abused! When being filmed they do not seem at all uncomfortable with him. And when asked if he ‘did those things to them’ they immediately said no. Their testimonies are consistent, genuine and without hesitation. I find it incredible that people would believe a mother would make up such a complex and bizarre story involving dozens of people including the school that they children go to. And attempt to ‘coach’ not one, but two very young children. Then take them to the Police station knowing that she or her partner are in fact guilty of abuse themselves. And for what? Custody? Surely if this was a case of custody, then she would have simlpy stuck to slandering the father, the old fashioned way. Not involve the whole community. I mean come on!

      Liked by 1 person

      • @Marny,

        I was not implying that the children have not been abused but was stating the obvious, really, about the likelihood that A C’s violent approach had prejudiced and undermined the case. That’s all.

        Like

      • Recognize ‘Katy’ for what she really is and you’ll understand that her preference that they the children had been sent to a “therapist” tells you everything that you need to know.

        Another one who wants to keep this “case” (not) in the closet :/

        Liked by 2 people

      • @Anonymous and Sabine,

        I don’t know what you’re accusing me of being exactly. No offence meant on my part.

        I have no idea why some people cannot see that A ‘s violence gave those in power ‘ammunition’ to take the children into care…unless you think the children made that up. I don’t know.

        I just wish that they’d all had the right sort of help with everything and had not been taken away from their mother. Who doesn’t wish that ?

        It’s understandable that fear for the other children made them confide a.s.a.p. in the police by whom E and A said they were ‘betrayed’.

        Publishing this on the internet, in the court of public opinion, and without protecting the children’s identities is not ‘ideal’ either, is it?

        This said, people’s human rights are all too often violated here in the U K and those with little or no status have no real ‘voice’ and cannot afford to go to a ‘proper’ court…and those in power all too often behave as though they are above the law.

        I hope that this case can still be fully investigated and that the mistakes which have so far jeopardised it from being so will/can be ‘overlooked’.

        Regards, Katy

        Like

  3. Just sent this to:
    bernard.hogan-howe, paul.settle, jane.kennedy, letters, mirrornews, dtletters, stletters, observer.letters

    To the Commisioner of the Metropolitan Police, and all the other addressees of this mail containing this witness statement: You are all servants of the public charged with both protecting the people of this land, and keeping those people informed of serious matters in the public interest. Your lawful duty to do this overides any legal considerations you may have. You are called upon to fulfil that obligation.

    I have attached The Witness Statement to this mail, as well as copied it here below:

    Witness Statement Reporting the Serious Crime of Fraud in a Police Investigation and Court Proceedings Statement made and sent last day of March, year 2015.

    I have been made aware of the very serious crime of fraud committed by Mrs Justice Anna Pauffley, a senior judge, Detective Constable Rogers of the Child Abuse Investigation Team at Barnet Police Station and Detective Inspector Cannon, who was in charge of a recent police investigation into child rape and murder in Hampstead, London. This fraud is revealed by Judge Pauffley herself, in her own words, in paragraphs 107. and 108. from her “Care Proceedings: Fact Finding” judgement made public, 19th day of March, year 2015:

    It is a curious fact that prior to the launch of these proceedings, no police officer had listened to the audio recording made by Jean Clement Yaohirou or watched the film clips of the children. DI Cannon made inquiries at my request to discover that DC Rogers, the member of his team who received the film clips and the audio recording from Mr Yaohirou, had sent them to a property store in Chingford. The focus would appear to have been upon arranging almost immediate ABE interviews.

    I say no more at this stage than that the police and social services inquiry could have taken an entirely different course if attention had been given to those recordings. At the very least, the questions asked of P and Q at interview would have been directed towards other areas of interest.

    The video clips and audio recording Judge Pauffley refers to constituted the entire evidence gathered in ella draper’s and abraham christie’s interviews with ella draper’s two young children. Some of these video clips contain the children’s very detailed descriptions and drawings of distinguishing marks, such as warts, birthmarks, tattoos, piercings, etc. on and around the private parts of the adults named by the children as their attackers.

    Jean Clement Yaohirou handed all of this crucial evidence to DC Rogers on September 5th, 2014. The police investigation began the same day, but throughout the investigation no police officer, “…listened to the audio recording made by Jean Clement Yaohirou or watched the film clips of the children” because DC Rogers, of the Child Abuse Investigation Team at Barnet Police Station, “…had sent them to a property store in Chingford.”

    Judge Pauffley rightly points out in paragraph 108. of her fact-finding judgement, “…the police and social services inquiry could have taken an entirely different course if attention had been given to those recordings. At the very least, the questions asked of P and Q at interview would have been directed towards other areas of interest.” This was effectively prevented by DC Rogers, who concealed from the investigating teams – both police and social services – throughout the inquiry, ALL of the crucial evidence he had taken possession of at the very beginning of the investigation. Concealing and failing to disclose this evidence was, and is, FRAUD. As you are aware, ignorance is no defence, especially in the case of a police officer in a position of public trust.

    Once DC Rogers’s fraudulent act was revealed to Judge Pauffley by DI Cannon, the Judge had no other lawful option but to stop the proceedings, but she continued. Judge Pauffley’s decision to continue with the proceedings knowing full well the police and social services investigations – which formed the basis of those proceedings – were woefully incomplete and criminally compromised, shows wilful contempt for the law by the Judge and served to perpetuate the fraud. Judge Pauffley’s claim( in paragraph 9. of her fact-finding judgement) that the police and social services investigations were “wide-ranging”,

    knowing DC Rogers had concealed from them the video clips and audio recording evidence, is also

    clearly fraudulent.

    Judge Pauffley also failed to remind DI Cannon of his duty to act on this information concerning DC Rogers.

    DI Cannon himself, upon realising DC Rogers had concealed vital evidence to the case, chose to do nothing, and made no protest to the Judge that the proceedings should be stopped. In short, he failed to carry out his lawful duty upon realising a fraud had been, and was being, committed – which is aiding and abetting fraud. Unlike the police officers and social services during the investigation, Judge Pauffley WAS able to view “a dozen or so short film clips of the children being questioned by Ms Draper and Mr Christie and listened to the very lengthy audio recording.” However, it seems the Judge did NOT view the video clips containing the children’s detailed descriptions and drawings of the distinguishing marks on and around the private parts of the adults named by the children as their attackers, as she makes no mention of these anywhere in her twenty-page fact-finding judgement.

    To reiterate: The incriminating evidence of fraud perpetrated by Judge Pauffley, DC Rogers and DI Cannon is provided by Judge Pauffley herself, in her own words, in paragraphs 107. and 108. of the “Care Proceedings: Fact Finding” judgement, 19 March, 2015. It is in plain sight for all to see. This fraud not only utterly demolishes the validity and credibility of the police and social services investigations, but as her “fact-finding” report was based largely on that investigation, it destroys the validity and credibility of her judgement too. In short, it is nothing more than a mockery of the law, and therefore null and void.

    Incomparably more serious are the EFFECTS of this fraud perpetrated by three public servants in high positions of public trust: It has put at further risk of harm the lives of not only ella draper’s children, but the lives of many more children(and adults) in Hampstead and beyond. If the “Distinguishing Marks” and “Drawings” videos had not been concealed from the police, the police interviews of the children would have necessitated questions regarding these distinguishing marks and the names of the individuals the children identified. The investigating officers would have been compelled by law, to require those people named and physically identified by the children, to submit themselves for medical examination in order to be eliminated from the inquiry. However, the police are NOW AWARE of the existence of the “Distinguishing Marks”and “Drawings” videos, so there is NOW nothing to prevent a proper and thorough police investigation being carried out, and those people named by the children can come forward to undergo a medical examination to clear themselves.

    Chief Commisioner, you are on notice that the lives of many children are at risk of harm, and you are called upon as a servant of the people of this land, to perform your lawful duty and to investigate those people named and physically identified by the children as their attackers without delay. You are also called upon to investigate the crime of fraud committed by DC Rogers, DI John Cannon and Judge Anna Pauffley, which has now been brought to your attention. What is required now is the safe return of ella draper’s children to her, or her grandparents’ care, the safeguarding of any of the children considered( by a large and growing proportion of the public) to be at risk of harm, and the commencement of a proper investigation into the alleged rape and murder of children in Hampstead, and beyond. As you realise, any “legal” obstacles impeding these requirements are contrary to the law and wishes of the people of this land.

    I hold only to that which is lawful, and do not consent to the transmutation of any living beings mentioned in this witness statement (including myself) to that of “legal person” status, or to any legal interpretation of my words whatsoever. All words and combinations of words used in this witness statement carry solely the meaning I intend them to convey, which is to tell the truth to the best of my ability in order to report the crime of fraud detailed above and to bring about an end to the brutalisation, torture, rape and murder of innocents – as I know such things to be contrary to the laws of humanity.

    from a conscious living being,

    Drifloud

    the last day of March, year 2015

    Yeah, I know it appears naïve, but yuo never know…….

    l

    Liked by 2 people

    • Drifloud, you have put this whole case into perspective and hit the nail on the head. What a brilliant letter/email/witness statement.

      Can we PLEASE arrange a protest outside the Barnet Police Station, asking why DC Rogers hid vital evidence.

      Like

  4. @ Katy
    March 31, 2015 at 3:53 pm
    “ I understand that the mother was happy to ‘blow the whistle out of fear’ for the other children. They would all three have been better helped by consulting a therapist or trauma expert …“
    Agreed.

    “not that people are necessarily covering things up but that the actions of the boyfriend have both undermined and prejudiced the ‘case’

    Most certainly both is true.

    … and it occurred to me that both of Ella’s ex-partners (natural fathers of her three children) are said to be members of the alleged satanic ritualistic sex cult, and that Ricky D. tried to groom her into it; a failed attempt. However, (a dear and loving father?) he didn’t give up on the children. Obviously he has been grooming them into the cult from early age of three and four.

    It might sound very far fetched and I certainly wouldn’t want to wrong anybody
    but can it be ruled out beyond any doubt that Abraham C. is connected to the cult?
    That there is no set up going on? To separate the children from their mother for good?

    Too bad – I rather choose to believe that Abraham has just been a little unwise. Not evil- minded but rather dumb/unreasonable &Ella ill advised to allow indiscreet videos (faces not blurred) be published on the internet. And all hell broke loose…

    _____________________

    @Drifloud
    March 31, 2015 at 4:31 pm

    Breathtaking. Fantastic!!! There are some inspiring heroes around…

    Like

  5. @ Nike,

    “It might sound very far fetched and I certainly wouldn’t want to wrong anybody
    but can it be ruled out beyond any doubt that Abraham C. is connected to the cult?

    Gosh, yes, I had not considered that possibility…and it is all very far-fetched – the stuff of nightmares. The retired policeman must have had his reasons for speaking up for the mother, too.

    “That there is no set up going on? To separate the children from their mother for good?”

    Perish the thought !

    “Too bad – I rather choose to believe that Abraham has just been a little unwise. Not evil- minded but rather dumb/unreasonable &Ella ill advised to allow indiscreet videos (faces not blurred) be published on the internet. And all hell broke loose…”

    Yes, it’s easy to say what should have ideally happened but it’s not a usual situation for a mother and her children to be in at all. If the mother honestly felt that they were ‘all in on it’, what else could she have done ?

    Like

    • #Part I: Ella Draper & Abe Christie’s testimony on Hampstead pedophilia
      (Comments)

      “I really appreciated this extra information. Ella and Abe have gone thru a tremendous ordeal, and guilty of nothing that would justify any of it. (What precisely are the charges against them?)

      But there is a saying, “when the going gets tough, the tough get going. Their resilience and determination are remarkable and admirable. It is apparent as they stated in this interview, that the actions of the courts and media, among others, make it clear that this hideous and appalling abuse of children is sanctioned, covered, and protected and even encouraged as a result. There can be no doubt about the prevalent evil now evident in our society. (No doubt about that)

      But more absurd is the big fuss made over a leak of videos, which seem to me to be private videos and not court evidence, should be used as an excuse to deny justice and charge people of contempt of court. (Big fuss? It’s a crucial question which must be clarified. Contempt of court? That’s the charge the police want them to interview about?)

      It is the court that has, beyond any shadow of a doubt, behaved with contempt for justice and acted treacherously. Modern day procedure and rules of evidence are clearly designed to deny evidence or rule exposure of evidence as violating some court rule, when in reality, no court evidence should ever be denied into the public at large, in the first place. A public trial should be open to the public and exposure of the videos has upset the court, not because of stupid rules but because they can’t cover this all up and and sweep it under the carpet. They have been exposed as traitors. Good! About time! (Very much agreed)

      There is not a thing on earth that Ella and Abraham could have done that would have satisfied this disgrace of a court, and changed any verdict. (Not a thing on earth? That’s too far reaching a statement)

      The coverup began many years ago and persists to this day. That is to say, the coverup is systematic, consistent, and never varies in result. I do believe that in the long run, the “premature” release of those videos has and will be the best representation that Ella, Abe and the kids could possibly get. (Right. THE WHOLE TRUTH MUST BE EXPOSED)

      A truly public trial is the only acceptable form a trial that should exist. If courts to not do their job honorably, then people will be forced to take their case to the internet public.
      (The dark powers that be will use that case to fight the free internet(!) in the name of privacy rights… in the name of state security… They don’t like their cover been torn away. The battle is on… and it’ll going to be a very fierce one – What bothers me most: these children are in the very midst of it all!!! They should not be victimized over and over again. It’s a double-sided sword… PLEASE, let’s never forget the children!!! Calling for an immediate protection order is an excellent move!!!)

      If the courts and governments do not like this (You can bet!), then let them start conducting trials with integrity, rather than concealment and coverup. (Right)

      I can only wish the very best for Ells and Abe. Between them and the kids, so much has been made clear to the public at large so that more will not get shell-shocked like Ella and Abe did. I suspect they both experienced a certain amount of numbing at some point, a deadening of feeling, from which grew determination.“ (says Truth1, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCj5pCg3P1s)

      (Ella’s statement is credible for sure. She’s lost her former naivety. Some reservations though
      Webre was on to it. About WHO leaked certain videos to the internet which needs to be clarified

      It seems obvious, the children are being groomed by their father Ricky D. He’s teaching them evil ways. Both children, and Alisa explicitly admitted that much.

      So, WHY don’t they flatly REFUSE seeing their father again? What hold does he have over them? It’s FEAR. Gabriel doesn’t feel protected – by their mother either. He’s ASKED: I want to see my Mum! What does Ella do about it? What would a loving mother do? That’s the question people will ask all the way through.

      G. says he HATES those parties, but he seems to admire his father for being ‘the boss of the cult’. Alisa is quite another story – I don’t know Alisa’s interview videos of Sept 17, 2014 yet. They’ve been taken down for some time now)

      Like

    • Thanks for posting this, Sabine…we are now all ‘in the picture’. Anyone listening to the mother and her partner, directly, would not have written anything negative about them in the local and national press – they would have understood their position and actions, too….in the proper context. Well, I do now, anyway.

      I’m sure that you all know how best to proceed from here. It’s good, too, that an ex-sergeant is speaking up for the mother…so I hope that you have the strength to keep fighting as you all are. Sorry if I put my foot in it…things are not always as they seem in life and, unlike you and other writers here, I don’t know any of the people involved. I am just a very concerned neighbour. Even I have had nightmares just from reading about this family’s ordeal so God knows it must be for them and for you !

      You said before that wishing well is not enough…I suppose you’re still pushing for ‘asylum’ for the family in Russia with the grandparents and also for a full investigation out of concern for all the children involved…here’s hoping 🙂

      Kind Regards, Katy

      Like

  6. Crimes of Empire. Thank you for this detailed analysis, I appreciate how much work you must have put into this, as with your other blogs. Keep up the excellent work.

    Like

  7. Alisa is quite another story # interview videos of Sept 17, 2014

    I’ve watched them once now. A try on analysis.
    Seems pretty clear:
    Alisa has NOT ‘exonerated’ herself. Quite the opposite (body language is very telling)
    Red flag: She’s had skype contact with her father Ricky D since Sept 11, and he’s the one who did the job (of compelling her to retract her former statements – my guess) There is nothing left for the investigating officer to do. Alisa rather bluntly (and totally inexpectantly!) admits to having told lies before (without being specific) WHY’s that all of a sudden?

    At the bottom of it: There’s a fight going on between the two men – Ricky D and Abraham C !!! (hopefully, Abraham C. has no links to the cult himself)
    and Alisa takes side with her natural father; Abraham has treated her wrongly and she very much resents that, and so she echoes her father now: Abraham is the one to be blamed… for making things up… and Ella is portrayed as being gullible, very much (too much) in love with A. believing his every word, and Alisa is convinced that their mother would never give up on Abraham – but rather loose her children? It’s about jealosy… and love that needs a lot of reassurance…

    Our fight is for the truth. For the best of the children (not about the fight between two cocks)
    Alisa has compromised herself to the truth. Obviously, she is her father’s darling defending her abuser. Equally obvious: She doesn’t like Abraham, she doesn’t accept his ‘parental role’ over her.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s