From the great internet community of ‘evil’ and ‘foolish’ people – reblogged from https://alanwrightson.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/anna-pauffley-ignorant-or-complicit/
But since the blog has been set to PRIVATE, here’s the original text:
This is Anna Pauffley (you can watch a video of her speaking here), the woman who thinks that when an eight year old girl and a nine year old boy spend hours on video, describing in detail how their father and various carers abused them, they were acting. They must have more ability at 8 than their minor Hollywood actor father does decades later, if that is true, because when one watches them talk, one can see that they aren´t lying. They corroborate each other, aren´t “high on hemp”, are not led into making statements, and clearly surprise the interviewer with their experiences.
Note: If youtube delete the video you can get it off my google
Medical evidence has ascertained that they both have anal scarring, and therefore long-term abuse has been going on, so that much is certain. Their mother´s partner, Abraham Christie, has only been with her for a couple of months, however, so he cannot be responsible, and they are quite categoric that it is their father and teachers and others in local power in Hampstead who “do sex to them”, not Abraham, the interviewer, or Ella Draper/Gareeva the mother.
Yet that is not enough for Anna Pauffley. What the children say about their abuse doesn´t matter, apparently. Although she does believe what they say when a policeman called Steve badgers them into a partial, unconvincing retraction. In fact, she has stated that she believes the mother and her partner who reported the abuse – were themselves abusing the children by tapping them with spoons playfully to encourage them to talk, whereas the years of sodomy and sexual abuse they suffered at the hands of their father and teachers, and which has been confirmed by the police´s own medical report, is not even worthy of a criminal investigation!
Why would the mother report the matter to the police if she was abusing them?
Why did Belinda McKenzie, the “McKenzie Friend” of the mother in court get stalked by secret police vans during the court hearings? Is this normal? Why did Sabine McNeill get chased off to Germany by hordes of police? Is this normal? Why did Ella Draper get chased off to Russia by more hordes of police? Is this normal? Why did the police close the case before even getting the medical report back? When this report confirmed abuse, why didn´t they re-open it?
Why didn´t judge Pauffley pass the case onto the police for a proper criminal investigation into who caused the now-proven longterm abuse?
Because there is now a policy of supporting child abuse at large within the British government. In this case, it was ensured that the children would be alone in england without their mother, in the clutches of a system that want to continue their abuse, so that custody could be given to their father – who they state had threatened to kill them if they spoke out about their abuse – despite his record of marital violence against the mother, and the fact that the children have categorically said that their mother never abused them, only their father.
And it is Anna Pauffley who has made all this happen. She could have listened to the children. She could have kept them with their mother who they have said has never abused them.
She could have turned the case over to the police for a criminal investigation, or at least taken note of the damning medical report that showed long-term anal scarring, and followed that up. But instead, she took the children off the mother who has never been accused of anything, increased the contact time the children had with their father despite the allegations against him, got the police to chase the mother out of the country, declared the allegations against the father to be fantasies without undertaking a proper investigation, smeared the mother via the mainstream press, and is now determined to hand the children over to the father who has systematically raped and trafficked them to other paedophiles for years on end.
Is she ignorant of systemic child abuse? Or is she, rather, part of the system which exploits it when it finds it happening within families?
Either way she is a disgrace. On the one hand, how can she be ignorant of systemic abuse given all the high-profile instances of it recently, when the Met is investigating high-level cover-ups of it, and when Lowell Goddard is being brought in from New Zealand to investigate it?
The alternative is that she does know, and is therefore part of the system which is encouraging the abuse of children, protecting abusers of children, and covering up the abusers of children.
Which one is it, Anna: are you ignorant of or complicit in childrape and its cover-up?
Does anyone give a shit about children anymore?