Dear Ministry of Justice,
I am writing in regard to British Authorities present approaches toward investigating allegations of child, sexual abuse and exploitation and child trafficking and murder.
Member States should encourage any person who has knowledge or suspicion of the sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of a child to report to the competent services. It is the responsibility of each Member State to determine the competent authorities to which such suspicions may be reported. Those competent authorities should not be limited to child protection services or relevant social services. The requirement of suspicion ‘in good faith’ should be aimed at preventing the provision being invoked to authorise the denunciation of purely imaginary or untrue facts carried out with malicious intent.
In arriving at the High Court Judgment, it is clear, that Justice Pauffley has shown most compassion toward the multiple, alleged abusers and their ‘public shaming’ as completely, innocent parties on whom no shadow of suspicion can be cast; the children’s allegations were false, the retractions are true, the later retracting of the retractions while in care of separate foster carers, was false, but now, the retractions of the original allegations and then later, retractions of the retractions, are even further embellished with accusations that Mother and her boyfriend coached the children and forced them to report false allegations to the Authorities. And, all of this latest testimony given while in full care and control of alleged abusers?
Considering how many times the children have changed their story depending on whom they are with i.e. alleged abusers and non-abusers – how in light of the LAW is it possible for any credible Judge to ignore the possibility that there is reason to doubt, the children’s latest testimony? EU Law Directive 26 very clear directs immediate investigation into any suspicion/possibility of child sexual abuse, child trafficking and child murder and regardless if witnesses etc retract their suspicions or allegations – mere suspicion is LEGALLY, enough to warrant an immediate and FULL investigation.
Justice Pauffley legally, should have been addressing the reasons why the aforementioned case had to be made public for the sake of honouring and abiding by EU Law in order to protect multiple children at possible serious risk. Children who perhaps remain victims of repeated sexual abuse and murder. With NO immediate, police investigation into verifiable facts and no examination of other “special children” who are cited as being sexually abused and considering that many of the professionals directly involved in handling this case, including the father are among the alleged abusers, how is it legally possible for Justice Pauffley to deliver such a swift and conclusive judgement?
The premise of Justice Pauffley’s Judgement is even more questionable when we consider her claim that the Mother’s motivation for abusing her children and forcing them to lie was in order she could have custody of her children and deny all access to the father. This is indeed, a very serious failing of Judgement because at the time of reporting the crimes in September 2014, the Mother had a full Residence Order for her children and estranged, violent Father being limited to twice monthly access. Certainly, who as a right minded parent, force their children to repeat such a truly horrific story? It really makes no sense that a mother wishing to discredit her children’s father would go so far as to involve a whole school, 20 other children, police, social workers, a church and then, to further embellish with details of killing, eating and skinning babies?
Justice in Britain CANNOT go beyond our common sense and it makes NO SENSE, that the Mother forced her children to make false allegations unless, the Judge had medical evidence to prove that Mother and her partner are seriously, psychologically, impaired and there was no such evidence presented to the Court. Justice Pauffley, failed even to note, that Mother had risked imprisonment and now forced to flee Britain and lose all contact with her children and only for the sake of having her own and her Counsel’s serious concerns and suspicions that are grounded in the legally required “good faith“, put to rest by a thorough police investigation.
Considering the time lapse between original reports and the recent High Court Judgement, all alleged abusers have been given ample time to hide evidence, cover their tracks and with continued access to their alleged victims, all the more freedom to intimidate and control the children: THIS LEGAL FACT OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE CANNOT BE IGNORED ACCORDING TO EU LAW.
Now, as a legally recognised COMPETENT AUTHORITY acting on behalf of British children in this case, I am asking the Ministry of Justice to ACT IMMEDIATELY in light of the very serious failings of the recent High Court and family Court Judgments in this case:
Two children we know of, are now at risk and in care of alleged abusers: PLEASE REMOVE THOSE CHILDREN FROM FURTHER RISK AND PLACE THEM IN CARE OF THE ONLY PEOPLE ALL PARTIES CAN BE SURE THE CHILDREN WILL BE SAFE WITH i.e. the children’s grandparents who are presently residing in the children’s London Family home.
I ask that the children be permitted to remain in the care of their grandparents until further investigations are completed and while Mother’s case for Appeal goes through and is heard because otherwise, in the interim and according to ALL the evidence AND according to EU Directives, there is a continued risk and high level of suspicion in good faith of original, very credible testimony of two witness-victims and medical evidence.
The Ministry of Justice MUST recognise that when Authorities themselves are suspect and or acting in blatant ignorance of the law and in denial of risk to children even, in light of very serious allegations, the MoJ NEEDS to act promptly in ensuring children’s safety and protection while further investigations are completed. It is also, of utmost importance that the Mother and her Counsel are permitted to return to Britain and and present her case without fear of arrest and indeed, it is a crime against their legal and human rights that they should suffer any such threat of punishment considering they have behaved lawfully and out of concern for the Mother’s own and other children’s safety.
In conclusion, I can only state that I am appalled at the levels of professional negligence and tardiness in handling and investigating this case. I am appalled that two children even now, after so many Court cases, STILL remain at risk and in care of largely, uninvestigated, alleged abusers. I am appalled, that as a member of the British public, a mother and her Counsel have had to turn to ME for HELP toward ensuring there is NOT a murderous paedophile ring controlling schools and churches in London? It is truly DISGUSTING that any legal or police system could expect a genuinely caring parent to hear such a terrible story from their children and then for them to just stay SILENT while their allegations to remain uninvestigated while children are removed from mum and handed over to alleged abusers by allegedly abusive authorities???
What KIND of a legal system considers THAT to be “Justice”? The Ministry of Justice surely needs now to make a decision about whether or not they stand by the Law or their negligent and allegedly, paedophile professional; EU Law stands with the child-victims disclosures given in freedom from their alleged abusers = THOSE CHILDREN REMAIN AT RISK. Please do something to PROTECT THEM.
Miss Deborah Mahmoudieh