ONLINE GIFTS to the #world: #GreatSpirit #WhistleblowerKids in #Dutch

This ‘medicinal troubadour’ was sent by Dutch blogger Don Quijote who is telling the story of the whistleblower kids in Dutch! In German it is on my blog and on the very popular one by The HoneyMan. He published already in 2010 that paedophilia is the elixir of satanism that is better protected than the gold in Fort Knox…

People are now getting together to respond to the 165 paragraphs of the judgement that I’ve called a political statement. It is also highly significant that Mrs Justice Pauffley used the same tactic as Sir Nicholas Wall with Vicky Haigh:

 

Vicky’s was the first high profile case because John Hemming MP named her and her council in Parliament. Her abused child was handed to the abusive father, she was imprisoned and can’t see her daughter until she is 18!!! She was imprisoned when she happened to see her daughter at a petrol station and said ‘hello’ and fled to Ireland to give birth to her second daughter…

We need to run a few operations as effectively as possible:

  • Educate Britain
  • Tell London and
  • Free the Kids!!!

Let’s stand our ground when facing the abusers and ‘cover-uppers’ – online and offline!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “ONLINE GIFTS to the #world: #GreatSpirit #WhistleblowerKids in #Dutch

  1. All High Court Judges, on appointment, must take the Judicial Oath (or Affirmation) which is as follows:
    “I, (name), do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth in the office of (office), and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm (or colony), without fear or favour, affection or ill will.”
    Reading this, and now being informed at length in a public document, of Lady Pauffley’s judgement and how she came by it, it is hard not to conclude she has breached her oath of office! Even were this not to be a criminal act (as it surely must or what would be the point of it?) it must be the most serious impediment to her continued occupation of the public position that she holds, and undermine any confidence the public might have in her holding it.
    She observes that the interested public must be “evil and/or foolish”. She also states prominently in the “Introduction and Executive Summary” that, “It is inevitable that a large proportion of those (the 4 million who had viewed the material on-line) have a sexual interest in children.” The fact that she bases these observations on no more than intuition, is sufficient to question her judgement of fact. It should also be regarded as a clear breach of her oath to, “Do right …. without fear or favour, affection or ILL WILL”.
    Nor can the manner in which Judge Pauffley undertook the “fact-finding sessions” support the notion that she fulfilled her Oath of Appointment, insofar that BIAS is clearly apparent, both in the proceedings and judgement. A fair and just assessment of the facts was plainly impossible without a “balance of arms” and transparency of proceedings in the case. The mother or her representative were not present; the proceedings were carried out largely in secret and unreported; children themselves were not apparently met, interviewed or allowed to give evidence. To rubbish their testimony as “hearsay”, when much of it was first-hand testimony of what they experienced and a failure to follow up on the specific allegations, clearly demonstrate an abrogation of her oath and the most basic rules of natural justice.
    Her failure to fulfill her oath to “do right without fear or favour” is illustrated, but not exclusively, in her treatment of the genetic father and “step-father” in the case. Only one paragraph (Para. 63) is devoted to the former’s denial of all accusations against him. This despite specific and repeated allegations by both children; objective police evidence of a propensity for violence and animosity to his former partner; evidence of earlier breaches in complying with court orders; circumstancially supportive factors such as geographical connections and business interests, including specifically participation in films of a sado-masochistic nature. All this is regarded as irrelevant and not even worth mentioning, before giving him a “clean bill of health” in the conclusion, “Neither child has been sexually abused by … Ricky Dearman” she concludes.
    In contrast no less than 39 paragraphs (paras. 69 to 108) relate directly or indirectly to the involvement of the step father, leading to the extreme conclusion, “Torture is the most accurate way to describe what was done by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms Draper”!
    I hold no truck for Mr Christie’s behaviour, methods or child rearing skills. Indeed I was disturbed by an apparent aggressive and unsympathetic manner demonstrated in some of the recordings but this does not negate the testimony of the children themselves, consistent and detailed to a number of different interviewers at different times. Nor should mistreatment by him, even if proved, be used to distract or absolve those that are principally accused. Yet again this is clear evidence of a failure to fulfill the solemn oath to implement English justice “without fear or favour”. Indeed quite the contrary, it appears to indicate the most obvious and damning bias!

    Liked by 1 person

    • EXCELLENT, Tim!!!

      I put it on this latest online initiative to substitute for the petition:

      ‘Whistleblower Kids’ & Hampstead Scandal – a Global Network

      London, GB
      2 Networkers

      This ‘internet community of good people’ is meant to bring us together: whether in London Hampstead and Highgate where the ‘Whistleblower Kids’ reported their abuse to have ta…

      Check out this Meetup Group →

      Hope you like my slight editing.

      Like

  2. Has anyone even questioned her credentials as a Judge? Most of these dupes in public office aren’t even qualified. They are placed there by the powers that be to serve their Satanic Agenda. This is worldwide.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s