The comments made by David on this video are excellent:
- parallels with Hollie Greig case in Scotland
- judges in secret family court system abusing the system.
Examples of what Judge Pauffley could have done but didn’t:
We demand that the alleged abusers of the Christ Church Primary School CE children, who were said to have distinguishing marks on their private parts, come forward to be examined by independent trusted doctors alongside trusted police.
This case is VERY difficult as the alleged abusers named included POLICE, CAFCASS, SOCIAL SERVICES, MANY teachers, parents, priests of various churches and others.
The #Whistleblower children allege they were part of a satanic sexual ritual abuse ring, with their father allegedly the cult leader. The children have told that some of the named have distinguishing marks on their private parts. None of them have come forward to prove this to be false. We demand this to be done NOW.
This is the online petition remaining after mine have been taken down with nearly 16,000 signatures: http://chn.ge/1v8VLVu?recruiter=43706425 PLEASE SIGN!
This is one example of an individual initiative of careful listening with currently 48 comments. PLEASE TAKE NOTE!
Barnet Police did not wait for the medical results before closing the case. Again, please note that the internet community of good people is neither ‘evil’ or ‘foolish’, but as objective as the judge should have been.
An excellent collation of videos examining the online presence of the alleged abusers. After all, there are some 70 of them on Hampstead Research.
The secret hearing in a civil family court was labelled ‘fact finding’. However, as an experienced McKenzie Friend writes:
the Judge has, in a civil court, undermined the Met Police investigations into harassment and child rapes by stating her findings in these criminal matters. Moreover by the naming of the parents the children’s identity will also be known where they now live/go to school and no doubt the children will now get bullied because of what is in the Press.
- JUDGE PAUFFLEY’S VERDICT: “Fact Finding” hearing RCJ March 2015
- Is Judge Pauffley DEAF, BLIND & DUMB? OF COURSE she would know !!
- Whistleblower News – DAILY