I had two Facebook pages that have been deleted, but I still receive messages by email. I have over 2,500 unread ones, but I found this one worth publishing, especially for people who did not participate in the ‘internet explosion’ ever since this first blog post – my email to the UK Home Secretary.
This conclusion by another remarkable Facebook client keeps me going: According to EU Directives you behaved lawfully Sabine and the UK authorities have not. I had only sent her the link to the UK Infringement of an EU Directive regarding sexual exploitation.
The result are documents for MEPs and the EU Commission with whom we had a meeting on 05.12.14. That was in the wake of our petition to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent. Since then, I have alerted MEPs to this worst of all child snatching cases, listing three of them as ‘interested parties’ in the Judicial Review against the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. The request was to re-open the case, also based on the Witness Statement provided by a former constable that analysed both the Police reports and the videos. Relevant extracts are here.
The critical timeline of events at the origin from reporting the crimes to taking the children is here.
Why would Police and Social Services collude to record the children a third time on 17.09.14 – six days after having been taken into ‘care’ and 12 days after the initial allegations reported on 05.09.14?
Who benefits from the Police cover-ups?
Remember their father had threatened to kill them if they were to talk. They had watched babies being killed. The most popular video Papa kills babies that had been uploaded had over 280,000 hits, but oodles of videos were deleted by YouTube.
The internet cover-up by YouTube and Facebook is fairly disturbing, to say the least…
Here’s the Facebook comment:
DOES THIS SOUND LIKE A #RETRACTION 2 U??? LISTEN TO THE DISCLOSURE TAPES IN FULL, THEN THE ‘RETRACTION’ TAPES IN FULL IF YOU CAN BEAR TO AND THEN SIGN THE PETITION PLEASE…..
In line with ER’s post, the retraction statements SHOULD also be disregarded because SIMON the interviewing police officer admits ON TAPE (Alisa ‘retraction’) that he had discussed the case extensively with her OFF CAMERA as in on the journey to Suffolk in the car. It is illegal to discuss witness testimony outside of the controlled environment wherein it is being filmed as evidence by a PROFESSIONAL police interviewer
It is also leading and thus contaminating to say things like DO YOU REMEMBER WE DISCUSSED THAT AND….ARE YOU SURE? and so on
clearly indicating coaching leading, contaminating….
SADLY some coerced ‘retraction’ clips have been cut and edited by unsavoury individuals to highlight the ‘retractions’ and cover up the duress and breach of protocol by officials who will pervert the course of justice at any cost AND I ACCUSE OFFICIALS AD INFINITUM….and not the terrorised Mother or Legal Advisor in exile under threat of arrest
The ‘retraction’ videos are on a par with HOSTAGES under threat of execution appearing on camera saying their captors are gracious and their cause JUST
as their haunted eyes and gaunt faces speak silently of torture and duress.
The retraction videos EXTORTED from the children were ABUSIVE and I still cannot bring myself to watch little Gabriel’s ‘retraction’ as Alisa’s was so torturous and her eyes, demeanour and psyche showed that she had been betrayed and violated with psychology, manipulation and intimidation despite HER MAGNIFICENT COURAGE in telling the AGONISING truth in September 2014 and again and again until captured and emotionally and psychologically tortured by the STATE.
SHAME on those police, social workers, legal liars and corrupt officials. I think the policeman SIMON left Gabriel unsupervised for ten minutes without even turning the tape off when he was TRUTH TELLING because it tore him up MOMENTARILY to know he was colluding to invalidate the truth that was tumbling out of this tiny little CHILD who was screaming for rescue from TORTURE RAPE AND BRUTALITY at a level most cannot even contemplate.
Simon all but ran out, re grouped no doubt with a good grilling for being emotional, AND RETURNED TO DUTY TO COMPLETE THE ATROCITY of turning truth into LIES at the expense of a little boy and girl who needed protection and deserved BEING BELIEVED.
HAUNTING. Do the right thing while you still live and breathe and TELL THE TRUTH SIMON!
Or live with YOUR COMPLICITY for eternity, knowing you betrayed Gabriel as he yearned and hoped against hope that the nice policeman would save him and send him and his sister home safely to Mama and Babushka…..AND LOCK THE BAD PEOPLE AWAY.
The original interviewing officer was called STEVE rather than Simon and I think it was the same one who did the retractions.
But I shall not publish links to the Police videos, as they are part of court proceedings. Bad enough that I dared to publish the Injunction Order based on the secrecy of family courts that is distinctly NOT in line with European legislation.
But: with this secrecy and adoptions against the will of parents, UK governments think they can be part of the EU club without obeying by the members’ rules… For how long still?