Before the trial ended, the Ham and High published: Satanic sex abuse protesters on trial. That was the 17th article creating our ‘local reputation’. How will they report that the other side did not achieve their goal of putting us behind bars? Will they report that some of them cut my telephone cables in five places, affecting my neighbour, too? Police have so far only pretended to investigate.
After the first few articles I had written to the editor in July 2015 as well as the Independent Press Standards Organisation IPSO – but it’s all a waste of time. I never got a reply. They know they can get away with …
In our trial, the judge assumed that a ‘campaign’ was being organised. Of course it has never happened before that people who believed the children did whatever they felt could support them – without being TOLD what to do – and without being PAID to do it.
Tomorrow the Open Data Institute presents a seminar on Who owns your reputation?
In this list of Ham and High articles, the titles are followed by the names of the people mentioned in capitals. Continue reading